Page 11 of 11 [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

z0rp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 747
Location: New York, USA

26 Dec 2008, 9:17 pm

Shiggily wrote:
z0rp wrote:
Well, going back to the reason why some people consider religious people to be under delusion.

Let's see the definition.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delusion wrote:
Psychiatry. A fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact: a paranoid delusion.


Resistant to reasoning is the part that mainly sticks out, although the latter part of the definition can apply to people who do not believe in evolution for example.


Evolution is not fact, despite how many scientists think it is. And the belief that a theory of the origin of the universe and life could be anything more than a possible suggestion (or even probable if the evidence is strongly in favor) IS a delusion.

So... humans are delusional.

You can believe in anything you want as long as you acknowledge that almost nothing in life can be considered fact, and absolutely nothing in life can be guaranteed 100% as absolute truth (as far as you know). Humans are too limited in their knowledge to claim what they know as being fact, despite the fact that historically they do so regardless of whether they are religious or not.

Evolution is practically proven, and even if it was wrong or something to that effect it, it does not validate or make the claim that some random creator created every single organism on the planet any less ridiculous an explanation. Also I'm not claiming that it's possible or not possible to know exactly what created the Universe, but I can tell you it's highly improbable that it was a god. And while I agree there are plenty of things we don't know and probably won't ever know, all I'm saying is basically that because we don't know it doesn't mean we should rely on fairy tales to explain the universe. If I needed to have an answer just to have one that bad I could think of far better ways to explain it, or perhaps look at the most logical theory that explains the question. I would rather go with a rational guess or just be honest and say I don't know.



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

27 Dec 2008, 1:04 am

z0rp wrote:
Well, going back to the reason why some people consider religious people to be under delusion.

Let's see the definition.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delusion wrote:
Psychiatry. A fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact: a paranoid delusion.

Of course, the problem is the difficulty with ascertaining fact, and the difficulty of identifying a particularly non-subjective definition of "reason".

You can dress up calling people teh st00pid, but you still can't take it to a fanceh restaurant.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,695
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

27 Dec 2008, 2:52 am

Shiggily wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
If I were to give 'Christianity' a root, it would would be after the resurrection 'supposedly' happened at the very least and when Simon Peter (Peter the apostle) became the first leader of the church. That's still talking within a few years of the crucifixion.


I would place it around the time Jesus began his teachings. But as you can see there is the problem. Everyone you talk to will set a different date for the beginning of "Christianity".


Right, its a question of which they're referring to - the ideas or the institution.



Shiggily
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,317

27 Dec 2008, 6:31 am

z0rp wrote:
Shiggily wrote:
z0rp wrote:
Well, going back to the reason why some people consider religious people to be under delusion.

Let's see the definition.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delusion wrote:
Psychiatry. A fixed false t: a paranoi d delusion.


Resistant to reasoning is the part that mainly sticks out, although the latter part of the definition can apply to people who do not believe in evolution for example.


Evolution is not fact, despite how many scientists think it is. And the belief that a theory of the origin of the universe and life could be anything more than a possible suggestion (or even probable if the evidence is strongly in favor) IS a delusion.

So... humans are delusional.

You can believe in anything you want as long as you acknowledge that almost nothing in life can be considered fact, and absolutely nothing in life can be guaranteed 100% as absolute truth (as far as you know). Humans are too limited in their knowledge to claim what they know as being fact, despite the fact that historically they do so regardless of whether they are religious or not.

Evolution is practically proven, and even if it was wrong or something to that effect it, it does not validate or make the claim that some random creator created every single organism on the planet any less ridiculous an explanation. Also I'm not claiming that it's possible or not possible to know exactly what created the Universe, but I can tell you it's highly improbable that it was a god. And while I agree there are plenty of things we don't know and probably won't ever know, all I'm saying is basically that because we don't know it doesn't mean we should rely on fairy tales to explain the universe. If I needed to have an answer just to have one that bad I could think of far better ways to explain it, or perhaps look at the most logical theory that explains the question. I would rather go with a rational guess or just be honest and say I don't know.


We do rely on fairy tales to explain the universe. Albiet fairly accurate fairy tales. Evolution is not practically proven.And to believe that it is, is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact. Evolution is possible though not mathematically probable, and so far it is a decent explanation of how we may have gotten here. No more, no less.

Now the belief that there is a god the began life and created the universe is also possible though not mathematically probable, and so far it is a decent explanation of how we may have gotten here. No more, no less.

Since you cannot prove nor disprove the existence of a supernatural being using natural methods. You just have to pick one and believe in it.

There really isn't a most logical theory because logic simply dictates that you do not know. And so walking around claiming your belief is most logical, fact or practically proven is subjective and quite silly.

Either life spontaneously began on its own, or it was created by something else. To be honest either option is possible, and both are highly improbable. But as they are the only two options we have though of yet. I wouldn't shut my mind to either option just because I might not like the outcome. That is poor science.

Now beyond how life began, beliefs split all over the place. Life could have been created and then it evolved, it could have been created as is, it could have evolved randomly, It could be a simulation, it could be a trick of the mind. No one knows.

I guess the difference between me and you is that I make a rational guess and admit that it is a guess and that I do not know. And you seem to throw all your faith behind one thing and believe that it is fact despite the fact that it isn't... allowing only its practically proven possibility when confronted with actual fact. Which is quite dogmatic (characterized by an authoritative, arrogant assertion of unproved or unprovable principles). I do not like that from either evolutionists or creationists.



Shiggily
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,317

27 Dec 2008, 6:31 am

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
Shiggily wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
If I were to give 'Christianity' a root, it would would be after the resurrection 'supposedly' happened at the very least and when Simon Peter (Peter the apostle) became the first leader of the church. That's still talking within a few years of the crucifixion.


I would place it around the time Jesus began his teachings. But as you can see there is the problem. Everyone you talk to will set a different date for the beginning of "Christianity".


Right, its a question of which they're referring to - the ideas or the institution.


yes which is why the best you could get is a time frame.



ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

27 Dec 2008, 10:37 am

ike wrote:
If I'm thinking about climbing a ladder, there are all sorts of preparatory actions my body can take that may or may not reach fruition. It can generate adrenaline in preparation for the climb and then I can change my mind because I realized that I need to do something else first.

But however complex your decision your body will know before "you" do what your brain's final "decision" is. And it will be preparing for that, with activity in the appropriate motor neurones etc, even as you think that you are just arriving at a decision.

Quote:
In order to say that free will is an illusion you have to provide evidence that it's never possible for people to make their own decisions.

Where could such a "free" will exist?

If you do not believe in a soul with existence outside of the physical universe, independent of the physical world, ( in which case how does it "act on" the physical world of your neurones ? ), then any part of you making decisions is always determined by something. And that "something" is in turn determined by something else. Ad infinitum back to beginning of universe.

Where in all that is your "free" will? Is it determined by something else or not? If it is then it is not "free", and if it is not then it must exist outside our physical universe, and then you need to explain how something outside of our physical universe has an effect on the brain.

Quote:
It would be a really crappy thing to propagate that idea, because it invalidates any sense of self-respect, esteem (self or otherwise) or pride in ones work or actions. You could never say "good job" to yourself or anyone else with any sincerity because, well, whatever they've done, it's not really their doing. They're just a robot after all, following the logical, deterministic course of what they've been programmed to do.

You forget that feedback has a powerful effect. It is data/input, which alters behaviour, encourages effort, reinforces "good" behaviour etc. Giving praise plays an important role in influencing/directing another person's actions. Everything in the universe is data which determines how other things in it function, and your praise may help someone else to do something.

Quote:
It invalidates any form of social justice at all, absolving people of responsibility for their actions.

It is the belief that free will exists which actually encourages lack of responsibility for one's actions, because it is possible to say that one was ill, under medication, drunk, scared, following orders, abused as a child, poor, badly brought up, and be partly, or completely, excused. As soon as realise that free will is just a belief, an illusion, see that noone has anymore than anyone else, ever. We all of us have none, at any time. There are no excuses at all.

Realising that there is no such thing as free will liberates one from thinking that some other, lucky, people have "more" of it than oneself, and other, pathetic/deprived/feeble types less. It is democratic. I see someone apparently totally unable to sort out their life, and I can no longer feel superior to them, for having got my life somewhat more "together". I see someone whose life looks super-sorted, in comparison to whom I previously felt permanently inadequate/a failure/less worthy, and now I know that they have no more free will than I have. This is good for me, ( and people around me ) ; it enables me to perceive people with more "love"/compassion, without resentment.

Practise using your free will, on things which are not easy, ( for me this has been giving up gluten, and sugar, but could be exercising, whatever ), and see what you achieve, how far you can go. So long as you don't use your free will, just keep it safe somewhere, don't risk it, it might seem solid enough. But actually try using it, risking it, and see if you don't find proof that everything you do is determined by god/the universe.

.