lau wrote:
The article was very, very intelligent.
A pity so many people (including me) failed to read it.
I read it but missed the point at first, so I gotta vote that, although factual, it was not intelligent (either that or I am the one lacking intelligence - any way there was a lack of intelligence between the article and this reader
)
The author was trying to illuminate a pro-as point of view, but the article was so overburdoned with anti-as info and the author's point was not forceful enough to be clearly made, and thus was burried under the avalanch of negativity.
I wished that his thesis statement had been more clearly stated so idiots like me could grasp it on the first reading
_________________
~
We sour green apples live our own inscrutable, carefree lives... (Max Frei)
~