Something I dislike about autism sites

Page 3 of 3 [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

04 Jun 2019, 2:46 pm

AquaineBay wrote:

Yet another thing I hate, when people associate Asperger's with having a high IQ. Your IQ and Aspergers/Autism have no correlation to each other. Then you put others down and start wondering why you don't have any friends.

It kind of does. Aspergers is considered a subcategory of “High Functioning Autism”. “High Functioning Autism” as defined by professionals is Autistic with average to above average intelligence or an IQ above 70. What happened is people cherry picked the part of the definition they wanted which is high IQ to genius or savant part leaving out the Aspies with intelligence in the average range. This trend has been accelerated by the elimination of the Aspergers diagnosis.

While I agree that Aspergers SHOULD NOT be defined by high IQ, or savant syndrome it does not matter. Colloquial terms are defined by how most people want them defined. It has nothing to do with how these terms should be defined.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,552
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA

07 Jun 2019, 12:33 am

AquaineBay wrote:
Joe90 wrote:
Quote:
But I simply don't believe you when you say that you have seen it written that "most NTs are stuck in menial jobs while autistics are high paid". No one would ever say anything THAT stupid. That's more idiocy than even idiots are capable of.


I have read that in a post on here once, but it was ages ago and I don't remember which thread it was in. Somebody said something along the lines of "I'm glad I have Asperger's because my high IQ has helped me succeed and get [enter good-paying job here], while NTs are mostly just in boring menial jobs" or something like that.


Yet another thing I hate, when people associate Asperger's with having a high IQ. Your IQ and Aspergers/Autism have no correlation to each other. Then you put others down and start wondering why you don't have any friends.
Same here. I'm ret*d compared to my peers & even lots of other Aspies cuz I struggled with most all the typical Aspie stuff as well as most subjects in skewl.
When I mentioned autism online lots of people assumed I was making big bux working with technology & was gonna be the next Bill Gates but I struggle with the latest technology.


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition


Mona Pereth
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,085
Location: New York City (Queens)

08 Jun 2019, 6:14 pm

Joe90 wrote:
I hate it when there's a typical Aspie trait commonly discussed on the forum, then suddenly one day a thread springs up saying that the opposite is an Aspie thing and everyone agrees.

I'm under the impression that there are a lot of issues on which autistic people are more likely than NTs to go to extremes, and on which some of us go to one extreme while others go to the opposite extreme.

Examples: (1) Autistic people are more likely to be intellectually disabled, but also more likely to be geniuses, than the general population. (Of course there are plenty of autistic people in the middle of the IQ range, too, but not as proportionately many as among the general population.) (2) Many autistic people tend to be detail-oriented, but many other autistic people have co-occurring ADHD and hence are not detail-oriented.

One website I saw had a long list of common, relatively less known autistic traits, which included lots of pairs of opposites. I don't remember what website that was, however.

Of course, by no means do all autistic people go to one extreme or the other for every such pair of opposites, but autistic people are more likely than NT's to go to such extremes, apparently.


_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.


Last edited by Mona Pereth on 08 Jun 2019, 7:09 pm, edited 4 times in total.

Mona Pereth
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,085
Location: New York City (Queens)

08 Jun 2019, 6:44 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
It kind of does. Aspergers is considered a subcategory of “High Functioning Autism”. “High Functioning Autism” as defined by professionals is Autistic with average to above average intelligence or an IQ above 70. What happened is people cherry picked the part of the definition they wanted which is high IQ to genius or savant part leaving out the Aspies with intelligence in the average range. This trend has been accelerated by the elimination of the Aspergers diagnosis.

There's more to it than this. Autistic people tend to be generally atypical in lots of ways and do not follow the standard bell curve on various traits including IQ. I'll dig up more info and links sometime later, in another thread.


_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.


nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,552
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA

08 Jun 2019, 8:15 pm

Mona Pereth wrote:
Joe90 wrote:
I hate it when there's a typical Aspie trait commonly discussed on the forum, then suddenly one day a thread springs up saying that the opposite is an Aspie thing and everyone agrees.

I'm under the impression that there are a lot of issues on which autistic people are more likely than NTs to go to extremes, and on which some of us go to one extreme while others go to the opposite extreme.

Examples: (1) Autistic people are more likely to be intellectually disabled, but also more likely to be geniuses, than the general population. (Of course there are plenty of autistic people in the middle of the IQ range, too, but not as proportionately many as among the general population.) (2) Many autistic people tend to be detail-oriented, but many other autistic people have co-occurring ADHD and hence are not detail-oriented.

One website I saw had a long list of common, relatively less known autistic traits, which included lots of pairs of opposites. I don't remember what website that was, however.

Of course, by no means do all autistic people go to one extreme or the other for every such pair of opposites, but autistic people are more likely than NT's to go to such extremes, apparently.
There's some things where the same autistic person can alternate between both extremes depending on the situation. For example there's a thread in the Bipolar & Other Conditions section where someone asks if Aspies can be overly sensitive & emotional because lots of things here & other places say Aspies are logical. As I posted in that thread, I'm a mix of both. I tend to be logical until something upsets me which can be very easy & then I sorta lose control. Another example is the detail oriented & ADHD thing. I tend to be detail oriented with some stuff but I also have ADD & not that detail oriented with other things. Sometimes I'm very detailed oriented with one aspect & then I suddenly lose focus or I miss details in another aspect.


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition


Trogluddite
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Feb 2016
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075
Location: Yorkshire, UK

08 Jun 2019, 10:40 pm

Mona Pereth wrote:
I'm under the impression that there are a lot of issues on which autistic people are more likely than NTs to go to extremes, and on which some of us go to one extreme while others go to the opposite extreme.

Examples: (1) Autistic people are more likely to be intellectually disabled, but also more likely to be geniuses, than the general population. (Of course there are plenty of autistic people in the middle of the IQ range, too, but not as proportionately many as among the general population.) (2) Many autistic people tend to be detail-oriented, but many other autistic people have co-occurring ADHD and hence are not detail-oriented.

One website I saw had a long list of common, relatively less known autistic traits, which included lots of pairs of opposites. I don't remember what website that was, however.

Of course, by no means do all autistic people go to one extreme or the other for every such pair of opposites, but autistic people are more likely than NT's to go to such extremes, apparently.

The longer I've spent in autism communities like this one, the more I've come to see autism in this light. On almost any thread about a specific aspect of behaviour, those who agree that they find it troublesome often report a wide variety of underlying reasons for why they feel it's troublesome, and likewise for those traits which people find beneficial.

To me, the stereotypical social differences seem quite obviously secondary effects of underlying perceptual and cognitive differences; not what autism is, but consequences of it. And any similarity in social and psychological consequences need not arise from any specific set of cognitive traits, but simply from there being sufficient "outlier" traits that the way we model the world inside our heads leaves us struggling to find enough common reference points with most other people (and them with us). When someone speaks in a language that is completely alien to you, the lack of comprehension is just the same regardless of which language it is. The behaviourists have been dominant throughout most of autism's history as a recognised condition, and according to their creed they made these resulting social behaviours the focus of research and treatment, which I believe has done a great deal to discourage acknowledgement of our diversity (the lack of recognition for female autistics due to them often not fitting a behavioural model based primarily on observations of males being a prime example.)


_________________
When you are fighting an invisible monster, first throw a bucket of paint over it.


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

08 Jun 2019, 10:45 pm

I remember hearing years ago how aspies are bad at math and have a hard time with it. Then years later I was hearing how they are great at math and excel at it.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


Mona Pereth
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,085
Location: New York City (Queens)

09 Jun 2019, 5:09 pm

Trogluddite wrote:
The longer I've spent in autism communities like this one, the more I've come to see autism in this light. On almost any thread about a specific aspect of behaviour, those who agree that they find it troublesome often report a wide variety of underlying reasons for why they feel it's troublesome, and likewise for those traits which people find beneficial.

To me, the stereotypical social differences seem quite obviously secondary effects of underlying perceptual and cognitive differences; not what autism is, but consequences of it. And any similarity in social and psychological consequences need not arise from any specific set of cognitive traits, but simply from there being sufficient "outlier" traits that the way we model the world inside our heads leaves us struggling to find enough common reference points with most other people (and them with us). When someone speaks in a language that is completely alien to you, the lack of comprehension is just the same regardless of which language it is. The behaviourists have been dominant throughout most of autism's history as a recognised condition, and according to their creed they made these resulting social behaviours the focus of research and treatment, which I believe has done a great deal to discourage acknowledgement of our diversity (the lack of recognition for female autistics due to them often not fitting a behavioural model based primarily on observations of males being a prime example.)

Makes sense to me. "Autistic behaviors" are just ways of coping with being a neurological freak of one kind or another. "Autism" is not one single "disorder" but a category of people who happen to have been born with various kinds of freakiness that make it hard to relate to NT's in "normal" ways, and that make it hard to cope with sudden change, etc.

And it is useful to have an officially-recognized category for all of us freaks, so we can find each other and, together, find ways to build a better world for ourselves.


_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

09 Jun 2019, 5:45 pm

Would it be fair to day that the people who post threads on WP aren't necessarily representative of all aspies??

Secondly those who start threads may make assumptions about what a typical Aspie is based on their personal experience.

Third some who start threads may project attributes to Aspergers that are (in reality) designed to inflate their own ego (for example High functioning Aspies are all geniuses, we have special gifts that NTs don't have etc etc...).

Fourth many who start threads use the term "autism" but in reality are harking back to the pre-DSMV diagnostic criteria of Aspergers because they assume that low functioning folks can't/don't read threads on this forum (I have discovered over the years this is untrue).



Mona Pereth
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,085
Location: New York City (Queens)

10 Jun 2019, 3:16 pm

Mona Pereth wrote:
One website I saw had a long list of common, relatively less known autistic traits, which included lots of pairs of opposites. I don't remember what website that was, however.

Of course, by no means do all autistic people go to one extreme or the other for every such pair of opposites, but autistic people are more likely than NT's to go to such extremes, apparently.

I just now found the page I mentioned above: Inclusive autistic traits.

P.S.: Here's another wideranging unofficial list of Asperger traits and a similar list of Female Asperger traits on a website belonging to Artemisia (formerly Rudy Simone).


_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.