I'm an empath. And it's a struggle.
Jonathan Scott Frakes is only an actor with a HASS degree, not a scientist with a STEM degree. He is obviously NOT an authority on Reality.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
HASS: Humanities, Arts, Social-Sciences (i.e., Psychology, Sociology, et cetera)
STEM: (Physical) Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics
HASS: Derives doctrine by inspiration from subjective revelation
STEM: Derives truth by induction from objective observation
HASS: Dominated by subjective opinions
STEM: Dominated by objective conclusions
HASS: Embraces the concepts of religion and spirituality
STEM: Rejects or is indifferent to the concepts of religion and spirituality
HASS: From revelation flows the study of the soul
STEM: From observation flows the study of the universe
HASS: The study of social history, interaction, and expression
STEM: The study of physical phenomena and their operating principles
HASS: Investigates obscure concepts in the pursuit of ethical futures
STEM: Investigates physical principles in the pursuit of greater knowledge
HASS: Less collaborative, more individualistic
STEM: More collaborative, less individualistic
HASS: Less reliance on mathematical models
STEM: More reliance on mathematical models
HASS: Receives less government research funding (~5%)
STEM: Receives more government research funding (~95%)
HASS: Reliance on faith
STEM: Reliance on knowlege
HASS: Sees human consciousness as the ultimate container, with the world existing inside it
STEM: Sees the physical universe as the ultimate reality, with consciousness existing inside it
HASS: Sees STEM as lacking humanity
STEM: Sees HASS as lacking discipline
HASS: Taught as discrete subjects
STEM: Taught as inter-dependent subjects
HASS and STEM are as different as night and day!
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,692
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
My parents watch a lot of crap on TV (crime dramas and the like) and I don't often stay in the room because I feel like I'd want to beat the crap out of many of the characters.
I could have a similar issue, whatever the right name is for it, but my way of dealing with it is not watching crap. I can see where watching stories of honor killings would be difficult and how yes, that's a real issue - like FGM - that we should all be well aware of and roundly / actively in opposition to.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.
HASS: Humanities, Arts, Social-Sciences (i.e., Psychology, Sociology, et cetera)
STEM: (Physical) Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics
HASS: Derives doctrine by inspiration from subjective revelation
STEM: Derives truth by induction from objective observation
HASS: Dominated by subjective opinions
STEM: Dominated by objective conclusions
HASS: Embraces the concepts of religion and spirituality
STEM: Rejects or is indifferent to the concepts of religion and spirituality
HASS: From revelation flows the study of the soul
STEM: From observation flows the study of the universe
HASS: The study of social history, interaction, and expression
STEM: The study of physical phenomena and their operating principles
HASS: Investigates obscure concepts in the pursuit of ethical futures
STEM: Investigates physical principles in the pursuit of greater knowledge
HASS: Less collaborative, more individualistic
STEM: More collaborative, less individualistic
HASS: Less reliance on mathematical models
STEM: More reliance on mathematical models
HASS: Receives less government research funding (~5%)
STEM: Receives more government research funding (~95%)
HASS: Reliance on faith
STEM: Reliance on knowlege
HASS: Sees human consciousness as the ultimate container, with the world existing inside it
STEM: Sees the physical universe as the ultimate reality, with consciousness existing inside it
HASS: Sees STEM as lacking humanity
STEM: Sees HASS as lacking discipline
HASS: Taught as discrete subjects
STEM: Taught as inter-dependent subjects
HASS and STEM are as different as night and day!
But isn’t that what complement means?
_________________
The river is the melody
And sky is the refrain - Gordon Lightfoot
Males and females complement each other when it come to procreation; but not when a man and woman are getting divorced for "Irreconcilable Differences".
A hungry engineering major ordering a meal from the philosophy major behind the counter may be performing complementary functions; but if the philosophy major is rude, screws up the order, and gives the engineer the wrong change, then the situation turns adversarial.
See what I mean?
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
I don't think the two "opposites" have to know they are working together in order to be complementary.
An example that comes to mind is the symbiotic relationship between algae and fungi that creates lichens.
Then there's the marriage of opposites, he's a recluse and she's a socialite and together they make their way through life.
When I take a really really long view of life, as in from the top of the moon (yes, I know the moon doesn't have a "top"), I can see that there are few places in which one person or one dogma or one whatever has it all right. It is the influence and impact of very different "sides" that moves human society forward, or backward, depending on your point of view.
So I think there is a natural tension between science and the other stuff and in the end it is that tension that leads us forward. I have not heard of this guy, or read anything and I am aware there is some really truly weird stuff out there.
That said, so many of the hard facts I was taught in science, in medicine, when I was a young twit, are now proven to be wrong. Some of the stuff I taught is now wrong. But it was "true" then. This can make one somewhat skeptical of each new scientific discovery. Whatever we know as scientists is still subject to more exploration, more learning. That is in fact what science is about.
_________________
The river is the melody
And sky is the refrain - Gordon Lightfoot
While HASS recipients are still debating the ethics of genetic research, STEM recipients are applying that research to curing diseases and improving the quality of life for everyone.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
And in 50 years, those will be looked upon the same as we look upon blood letting now.
_________________
The river is the melody
And sky is the refrain - Gordon Lightfoot
