kraftiekortie wrote:
Of course I don’t believe that controlling tom cats in that matter is proper. I believe in what you believe.
I think the guidance in OP is relating to cats and dogs.
Breeders can sometimes be dangerously obsessed with either pedigree or money. And the two things (pedigree and money) kind of go hand in hand.
I'd say breeders can be ok if they just have an indoor cat who goes for a weekend etc with another cat. But even so, it's an expensive way to get a cat and all for the sake of it looking a certain way. (Ragdolls are cute but so are moggies). And even in homes, they don't seem to care, like I said about the tom cats or like my Maine Coon cat who had all sorts of infections when we got her
Selling cats and dogs from cages in a pet shop is illegal in the UK so I've only seen it once when I was abroad somewhere (I think the canary islands). It did look cruel. We sell small animals from cages in pet shops here and maybe I'm ignorant about them but it only seemed cruel in the Pets at Home shop (cos dogs were going up to rabbit hutches... dogs shouldn't be allowed in shops that sell small animals)
I feel like the entire situation might be different with rats vs cats and dogs. I think the ideal situation for all animals is: one human has a pet, their pet has kittens/puppies/whatever their babies are called, the human gives them away to friends they know will care about them. But I'm not sure there's a 'rat mill' system like there's a 'puppy mill'/'kitten mill' system or that for eg giving them away from animal shelters is the correct solution.
OP might be doing the aspie thing/autistic thing of taking everything literally and personally in what's been written. What's been written might have been advising about cats and dogs rather than other pets, with the NT assumption that "everyone knows that".
_________________
Not actually a girl
He/him