<* Codger Voice *>
I remember, back in the 1980s, when IBM introduced the first business-level PCs and XTs.
There was fear over reports of "Statistical Clusters" of miscarriages, missed periods, cancers, and other issues related only to women. While there was little to no valid evidence to support claims of a causal connection, there was near-panic that office computers (especially computer monitors) were causing these problems in women. I mean, women held mostly admin/secretarial jobs back then and those jobs required computers, right?
Anyway, I started seeing ads for shields, screens, and Faraday enclosures designed to keep that harmful "Computer Radiation" out of women's bodies -- one woman showed up to work wearing the same kind of lead apron that radiologists wear when taking x-rays!
The most laughable product I saw was a spray-on "shield" -- spray it on, wipe it off, and you were (allegedly) protected from 99.97 percent of the harmful rays emitted by your computer!
The problem was that people were spraying themselves with this stuff, which amounted to nothing more than re-packaged furniture polish. Ahh ... that lemony scent!
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.