Iliberalism in America undercuts efforts to stop Russia

Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

23 Feb 2022, 11:54 pm

Putin's actions in Ukraine are an attack on liberal democracy by Cathy Young

Quote:
after weeks of tensions, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a televised speech Monday which made his intentions clear. After a lengthy ramble about Russia’s historical and more recent grievances, he announced that Russia was recognizing the independence of two Ukrainian regions seized by so-called separatist rebels in 2014, the "People’s Republics" of Donetsk and Luhansk. Moments later, he signed an order to send Russian "peacekeeping troops" to those regions.

This is not only a blatant assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty, but also an attack on the international liberal order — a challenge that should force us to confront the question of whether liberal democracy has the will to defend itself.

Obviously, what the world can do is limited by Russia’s massive nuclear arsenal. For the United States or European powers to take direct military action in defense of Ukraine — which is not required by any treaty obligations — is to risk World War III. But there are other things that can be done to make war as costly as possible for Russia, from economic sanctions like the ones President Joe Biden announced Tuesday to aiding Ukraine with weapons and supplies.

A strong response to Russia requires seeing the current conflict in the stark terms of authoritarianism vs. the free world.

Yet the situation is complicated by the fact that hostility to liberal values and institutions has been on the rise in many democracies, the United States above all.

A large number of American right-wing pundits today, such as Fox News hosts Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham, are frankly hostile to Ukraine and sympathetic to Putin’s excuses for invasion. In addition to this rhetoric is an even more basic rejection of liberalism by conservative intellectuals who believe that liberal democracy inevitably leads to moral decadence, tyranny against traditional religious communities, and loss of cultural self-confidence — and that decadent liberal states are helpless against authoritarian powers whose cultural self-confidence is undiminished.

The left is not off the hook. The past few years’ radical progressivism, while addressing some real problems, often demonizes liberal societies and institutions in toxic and self-destructive ways. If you barrage people with the message that freedom is just a smoke screen for white supremacist capitalist patriarchy, calls for defending the free world won’t sound very compelling.

We are in a new Cold War with liberal democracy’s adversaries, mainly Russia and China. But those who cherish the liberal order also need to win a cultural cold war on the homefront.

Adding to her case all involved know that Russia will outlast the sanctions. America is a fundamentally divided self-involved country that has proven it will quit after a period of time if you can take the initial pain. Russia will retaliate by cutting off oil which is 10 percent of American imports if people are bitching about inflation now. Crippiling cyberattacks will probably happen also. The collapse of the sanctions will start with a few "humanitarian" exceptions and go from there.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


The_Walrus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

24 Feb 2022, 12:47 am

Russia cutting off oil would be much more harmful to Russia than to anyone else imo. I suppose they could seek to pivot to China and neutral countries who don’t join the sanctions regime, but those are much less lucrative markets than NATO, Japan and Korea.