klanka wrote:
Yeah and that
I think the real solution was for the workers to form unions and negotiate better conditions and wages.
It mentions in the communist manifesto that people were already starting to do that.
When they don't have that outlet and a dictatorial state is responsible for that situation it's hard to argue more violent options don't become more reasonable.
If the state is going to use force against you for trying to organize it becomes a lot easier to see violent resistance against said state as reasonable and justified. If the state refuses to allow it and the political system makes changing that impossible, violence against that state might be inevitable.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.