The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
ChicagoLiz wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
No one said that, that’s a very weird and abnormal assumption.
From the OP:
Quote:
Besides, a woman like her has better options than me.
Leagues exist. Why people here keep denying it?
If so-called leagues exist, how do we know that this specific woman would be against dating someone from a lower ranking league (not that I agree with that dehumanizing rhetoric)? I don’t think I would like people to make such assumptions about me - to assume that I was shallow or whatever people seem to think based solely on my appearance. It would seriously suck.
It just seems to be a limited and limiting perspective that could lead to erroneous assumptions and missed opportunities, not that I would want to be pursued unless I demonstrated some sort of interest, though.
It’s an oversimplification of a complex topic that contains a fair amount of nuance and diversity of thought. Even highly attractive people can be demisexual for instance. That’s just one possibility among many.
People can hit it off for any number of reasons, too. Sometimes sparks fly with someone who’s less attractive and not with someone who’s more stereotypically good-looking. It’s not like a woman is necessarily going to go with the hotter option, whatever that means, just because she has more options.
It’s really not that uncommon for people to date someone who’s more or less conventionally attractive than themselves, either, not that there aren’t different ways people can be attractive and individual variation when it comes to preferences.
I don’t even understand what the focus on appearance is all about. It’s not like it makes any difference in how someone will treat you. Then again, we can like what we like… There’s nothing wrong with that…within reason.
_________________
“Les grandes personnes ne comprennent jamais rien toutes seules, et c'est fatigant, pour les enfants, de toujours et toujours leur donner des explications.”
— Le Petit Prince