Page 1 of 1 [ 1 post ]
Today, 6:27 am
Quote:
Mullvad has responded to questions surrounding a political donation made by one of its owners, stating that the contribution was a personal decision and did not involve or represent the VPN provider or its affiliated companies.
The company published its official statement on July 21, 2026, following public discussion about a donation made by co-owner Daniel Berntsson to a Swedish political party. Mullvad said the attention the matter received prompted it to explain its position.
Mullvad Says Political Donation Was a Personal Decision
According to Mullvad, the donation was made by Daniel Berntsson in his private capacity. The company emphasized that neither Mullvad nor its parent or sister companies endorsed or participated in the contribution.
The VPN provider acknowledged that the issue had generated questions but said its position remains unchanged. It added that its organizational values and public advocacy are separate from the personal political views or actions of its founders.
Company Reaffirms Focus on Privacy, Free Speech, and Online Freedom
In its statement, Mullvad described itself as a political company only in the sense that it advocates for privacy, freedom of speech, and freedom of information. It said these goals are pursued by developing products that help counter censorship and mass surveillance, supporting privacy-focused open-source technologies, and campaigning against measures it believes threaten digital privacy, such as Chat Control proposals and identity verification requirements.
The company said it intentionally avoids taking positions on broader political issues outside those core areas. According to Mullvad, this approach allows it to work with customers, employees, suppliers, and partners who may hold different views while remaining focused on shared privacy goals.
Mullvad Says Its Mission Will Remain Unchanged
Mullvad said it has built a culture of what it describes as "radical tolerance," arguing that protecting privacy and the free exchange of information requires supporting a neutral environment where ideas can be shared regardless of whether people agree with them.
Addressing the recent controversy directly, the company said it neither supports nor condemns the donation. It added that the decision was most likely "a bad idea," while also stating that societies benefit from a diversity of ideas that can be debated openly.
For VPN and privacy users, the statement confirms that Mullvad's privacy-focused products, advocacy work, and company mission remain unchanged despite the controversy. The response has been officially published by Mullvad, making it the verified source of the company's position.
Users do not need to take any action. The announcement serves as a clarification of Mullvad's stance and reiterates that the company's operations and privacy commitments remain separate from the personal political activities of its founders.
The company published its official statement on July 21, 2026, following public discussion about a donation made by co-owner Daniel Berntsson to a Swedish political party. Mullvad said the attention the matter received prompted it to explain its position.
Mullvad Says Political Donation Was a Personal Decision
According to Mullvad, the donation was made by Daniel Berntsson in his private capacity. The company emphasized that neither Mullvad nor its parent or sister companies endorsed or participated in the contribution.
The VPN provider acknowledged that the issue had generated questions but said its position remains unchanged. It added that its organizational values and public advocacy are separate from the personal political views or actions of its founders.
Company Reaffirms Focus on Privacy, Free Speech, and Online Freedom
In its statement, Mullvad described itself as a political company only in the sense that it advocates for privacy, freedom of speech, and freedom of information. It said these goals are pursued by developing products that help counter censorship and mass surveillance, supporting privacy-focused open-source technologies, and campaigning against measures it believes threaten digital privacy, such as Chat Control proposals and identity verification requirements.
The company said it intentionally avoids taking positions on broader political issues outside those core areas. According to Mullvad, this approach allows it to work with customers, employees, suppliers, and partners who may hold different views while remaining focused on shared privacy goals.
Mullvad Says Its Mission Will Remain Unchanged
Mullvad said it has built a culture of what it describes as "radical tolerance," arguing that protecting privacy and the free exchange of information requires supporting a neutral environment where ideas can be shared regardless of whether people agree with them.
Addressing the recent controversy directly, the company said it neither supports nor condemns the donation. It added that the decision was most likely "a bad idea," while also stating that societies benefit from a diversity of ideas that can be debated openly.
For VPN and privacy users, the statement confirms that Mullvad's privacy-focused products, advocacy work, and company mission remain unchanged despite the controversy. The response has been officially published by Mullvad, making it the verified source of the company's position.
Users do not need to take any action. The announcement serves as a clarification of Mullvad's stance and reiterates that the company's operations and privacy commitments remain separate from the personal political activities of its founders.
My take:
Would I trust Mullvad now ... heck no!! !
Honestly, I use Proton VPN now on the rare occasion.
https://protonvpn.com/pricing
Be safe folks out there and enjoy your day
EDIT:
I would also avoid their browser too - there are better (trusted) Firefox fork choices such as Libre Wolf Browser and Pale Moon. Pale Moon sometimes hangs but I fixes itself if you take your time. I rarely use Pale Moon now. Libre Wolf is my default.
https://www.librewolf.net/
