exec wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Neither, because I don't believe 'god' can be defined adequately to make those sorts of emotions relevant.
Dare I ask ... how would you define "God"? I (guess) believe "God" is in us already and we are all related to each-other. Maybe?
I'm not sure I would define 'god' at all, it's not a relevant concept to my life.
I understand that others might have definitions for the word and that those definitions aren't always coherent with one another. This lack of coherency is at the core of why I can't view the concept of god/gods as anything more than a human construct.
You could replace 'god' with 'the boogie man' or 'heffalumps and woozles' or 'my fairy godmother' or 'the great pumpkin' in most uses and the meaning would remain the same, in my eyes.
Many people invoking the concept isn't enough to presuppose there's any objective truth behind the concept.
Do you love heffalumps and woozles, or do you fear them, or do you just think that it's an inherently silly question because everyone knows heffalumps and woozles don't exist?
_________________
There's no such thing as a free market.If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm XJust a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.