RadiantAspie wrote:
I have to ask you guys a question. Why do you guys have the tendency to assume autism in individuals who exhibit little to none of the traits associated with it? Or assume that just because they have one trait in common, that they must have it?
Many of the traits and symptoms associated with Autism are also prevalent in other neurological conditions, never mind the fact that they appear in most humans in general (just not as severe or obvious though).
I agree with your sentiments. Many people do speculate when only one or two traits are evident in an individual. Asperger's Syndrome is a collection of traits and when enough traits come together to form a critical mass, one is then prudent to query whether the person does, or did, have Asperger's Syndrome.
I look at the DSM IV manual as a checklist. If a historical figure exhibited enough behaviours where he/she could be considered in earnest to be an Aspie, then I then post a query as to his/her possible Asperger's.
All in all, I believe that one needs to be prudent when considering whether someone of historical significance had Asperger's. However, when one is more careful, such speculation should not be dismissed
a priori.