Lefebvre wrote:
Intolerant atmosphere on this site - Do you agree?
No, not at all. I was banned from this site for two years, and now I'm back. The only 'intolerance' I see is from a few members who whine and cry because they do not get their way - their duplicated posts get removed, their attempts at trolling are put down, and they are reminded that there are rules of conduct on this website that we all must follow.
Lefebvre wrote:
I started with a topic, this was removed by Tallyman (for no reason, just an arrogant mod)...
Evidence, please? I mean, please provide evidence that Tallyman (or any other mod) does anything "for no reason".
Lefebvre wrote:
... then a sarcastic response by Moog in the 'getting to know' thing, then my topic here is removed...
I trust Moog. He's a fair-minded bloke, here and on other websites. So what if he wouldn't let you get your way?
Lefebvre wrote:
... where is it, it's like Kafka here.
I think you mean "Kafka-esque". Look it up.
Lefebvre wrote:
Is this the way America is dealing with freedom of speech.
Yes. The First Amendment - adopted on December 15, 1791 - clearly states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Note that this "Freedom of Speech" claim you've made is irrelevant, since (1) Tallyman and Moog are not "Congress"; (2) This is a privately-owned website; (3) members of this website, by virtue of being members, agree to abide by the rules of this website; and (4) Congress does not control this website or its contents.
Deal with it.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.