I expressed my concern because when REAL scientists would post truthful and informational videos on YouTube, poorly-educated people will easily assume that any video posted on YouTube must also be truthful and informational. This bodes well for quacks, Trumpsters, anti-vaxxers, and other crackpots pitching their favorite conspiracy theories; but not so well for honest scientists calmly presenting factual information.
It takes more investment to write, edit, and publish a textbook than to post a video. Thus, a person writing a textbook must be careful to be truthful and include only scientifically sound information, or he/she stands to lose a great deal of money when no one buys the book, or the book is removed from the publisher's catalog for being inaccurate. No such risk exists on YouTube, so there is no incentive to be truthful and informational. Quite the opposite, in fact -- the more outrageous the claims, the more views a YouTube video receives.
So, yes, I paint all YouTube videos with the same broad brush. This saddens me, but trying to teach critical thinking skills to non-scientific people is like trying to teach hamsters to perform differential calculus -- it is just a waste of time, and the hamsters do not like it.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.