Page 2 of 4 [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next


What is the source of morality?
Religious teachings/divine origin 28%  28%  [ 10 ]
Morality is relative 11%  11%  [ 4 ]
Conscience/Natural Law 42%  42%  [ 15 ]
Philosophy 6%  6%  [ 2 ]
I am beyond morality 14%  14%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 36

Kepler
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 15

05 Sep 2007, 9:40 pm

A lot of things can be relative, especially social conventions... so what's important is considering what the most noble/divine thing to do would be and then to do it, regardless of what specific religion/philosophy you're taking direction from. Not that this is necessarily easy, though. In fact, I think it can be one of the hardest things to do. Of course, this assumes that inside each person is some kind of a divine "spark" and I'm not sure how true this assumption is necessarily; it's really something I take more on faith than anything else because to not believe it leads to some philosophical places I'd really prefer not to go. So, then, if there is no sort of contact with a "higher self"/deity/wahtever... I really have no idea where morality comes in.



monty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,741

05 Sep 2007, 9:55 pm

The law of karma is the ultimate source of morality ... what we do to others we do to ourselves. This was stated by Buddha and Jesus and most major religions in the golden rule or whatever they call it in their brand. Its in Wicca, its in Voudou.



Aridarr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,294
Location: Over the stars...?

05 Sep 2007, 10:17 pm

It is worth remembering that morality is not confined to humanity.

To my knowledge, many social species are naturally inhibited against wanton violence towards one another.

For example, in a fight, a wolf will not attack another that has bared its throat in submission.

It is simply a natural mechanism that prevents animals in social groups from killing one another mercilessly.



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

05 Sep 2007, 10:24 pm

Aridarr wrote:
It is worth remembering that morality is not confined to humanity.

To my knowledge, many social species are naturally inhibited against wanton violence towards one another.

For example, in a fight, a wolf will not attack another that has bared its throat in submission.

It is simply a natural mechanism that prevents animals in social groups from killing one another mercilessly.


I agree that is how they began.



ahayes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,506

05 Sep 2007, 10:48 pm

what is this morality thing you speak of and how can I use it's power to crush my enemies?



The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,357
Location: Looking down on humanity

06 Sep 2007, 1:13 am

I said conscience, but it's more common sense. You learn what's good and bad, and therefore what's moral or immoral/amoral; and then you apply common sense to it and if you know something is wrong, you don't commit that wrong.

Flagg: Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came.... - liked the first 3 Dark Towers, but got bogged down in Wizard & Glass.


_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!

Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.


UncleBeer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 683
Location: temporarily trapped in Holland

06 Sep 2007, 1:28 am

One of the wisest things ever written down is the Golden Rule (and not because of its religious origin, but simply because we all like to hope we'll be fairly treated): Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

All other laws and rules are merely extensions to this.



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

06 Sep 2007, 3:23 am

UncleBeer wrote:
One of the wisest things ever written down is the Golden Rule (and not because of its religious origin, but simply because we all like to hope we'll be fairly treated): Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

All other laws and rules are merely extensions to this.


What about lex talionis?



gwenevyn
l'esprit de l'escalier
l'esprit de l'escalier

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,443

06 Sep 2007, 3:25 am

Flagg wrote:
What about lex talionis?


What about the first rule of Fight Club?

In seriousness, I think he meant "all moral rules". I wouldn't call the law of retribution a moral rule. It's an excuse for violence.


_________________
The machine does not isolate man from the great problems of nature but plunges him more deeply into them. -Antoine de Saint Exupéry


Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

06 Sep 2007, 3:36 am

gwenevyn wrote:
Flagg wrote:
What about lex talionis?


What about the first rule of Fight Club?

In seriousness, I think he meant "all moral rules". I wouldn't call the law of retribution a moral rule. It's an excuse for violence.


No, it was used in some moral codes of ancient societies and is still used by some religions as the norm in morality. I'm not saying it's right, it's only a moral you don't like.



UncleBeer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 683
Location: temporarily trapped in Holland

06 Sep 2007, 3:53 am

Flagg wrote:
UncleBeer wrote:
One of the wisest things ever written down is the Golden Rule (and not because of its religious origin, but simply because we all like to hope we'll be fairly treated): Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

All other laws and rules are merely extensions to this.

What about lex talionis?

What about it?



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

06 Sep 2007, 3:56 am

gwenevyn wrote:
Cyanide wrote:
I go by my own conscience. I have my own ideas about what is honorable and dishonorable.


If every man follows his own conscience, how can anyone trust anyone else?


Because our consciences are developed from the
society around us. Some issues are hardwired in
(like protecting one's brood), while others are
probably more a matter of learned behavior (not
lying, for example). Plus, one's own morality might
dictate terms of vengeance, through which the society
can protect itself, in extra-legal ways.



gwenevyn
l'esprit de l'escalier
l'esprit de l'escalier

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,443

06 Sep 2007, 3:56 am

Flagg wrote:
gwenevyn wrote:
Flagg wrote:
What about lex talionis?


What about the first rule of Fight Club?

In seriousness, I think he meant "all moral rules". I wouldn't call the law of retribution a moral rule. It's an excuse for violence.


No, it was used in some moral codes of ancient societies and is still used by some religions as the norm in morality. I'm not saying it's right, it's only a moral you don't like.


I guess. It's just that I think of morals as being rules to protect, not to harm.

I wouldn't, for example, call the death penalty a moral rule.

Probably not a good definition though. I'm fading rapidly, it being 2 am and all.


_________________
The machine does not isolate man from the great problems of nature but plunges him more deeply into them. -Antoine de Saint Exupéry


calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

06 Sep 2007, 3:57 am

gwenevyn wrote:
Flagg wrote:
What about lex talionis?


What about the first rule of Fight Club?

In seriousness, I think he meant "all moral rules". I wouldn't call the law of retribution a moral rule. It's an excuse for violence.


No, it clearly IS a moral rule
for some. One doesn't just want
to commit violence, without harm
being inflicted first (well most don't).

The great crime families just had
their own set of mores.



gwenevyn
l'esprit de l'escalier
l'esprit de l'escalier

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,443

06 Sep 2007, 4:15 am

calandale wrote:
One doesn't just want
to commit violence, without harm
being inflicted first (well most don't).


That's no small exception. With "eye for an eye" all it takes is one sociopath to get a snowball effect rolling along.


_________________
The machine does not isolate man from the great problems of nature but plunges him more deeply into them. -Antoine de Saint Exupéry


calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

06 Sep 2007, 4:20 am

gwenevyn wrote:
calandale wrote:
One doesn't just want
to commit violence, without harm
being inflicted first (well most don't).


That's no small exception. With "eye for an eye" all it takes is one sociopath to get a snowball effect rolling along.


Worked fine in smaller societies,
and is still necessary, for things that
the law can't handle.