Democrats and liberals: Why are you not more liberal?

Page 2 of 5 [ 69 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Fred2670
Deinonychus

Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 305
Location: USA

09 Apr 2008, 8:02 pm

Warsie wrote:

Basically you said you would shoot all the liberals.

Yeah ok sorry for the confusion
I merely and figuratively embellished the rag

The very premise of this thread is nothing more
than a trap. Kind of a "tell me what you think and
I'll tell you why you're wrong" sort of post.

Trolls afoot
Ye be warned

_________________
ALT+F4=Life

Warsie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Apr 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,542
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

09 Apr 2008, 9:43 pm

^^
cool

good night too.

_________________
I am a Star Wars Fan, Warsie here.
Masterdebating on chi-city's south side.......!

Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

09 Apr 2008, 9:46 pm

Fred2670 wrote:

Great thread ! !!

Will the liberals in the room please stand up.. so I can pick them off one by one with my ultra arrogant right wing fanaticism gun. In fact who out there thinks they might be the most liberal? I want to fire a couple shots into THAT guy first.

could be me :!:

...

use_your_words
Blue Jay

Joined: 9 Dec 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 96

10 Apr 2008, 9:10 am

Ragtime wrote:

So, I wanted to ask those who are in favor of liberal policies why you choose not to just spontaneously be as liberal as possible.

I'm not sure I entirely understand what you're asking. I mean, people don't generally just choose to be "liberal" or "conservative" (at least, not as far as I know). They have opinions on certain issues, and then derive their ideology from those opinions, not the other way around. If someone shares a more liberal point of view on most issues, and then a conservative point of view on a few, why should they sacrifice what they believe about those few issues just to spontaneously be as liberal as possible?

_________________
"No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less...any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind..."

Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

10 Apr 2008, 10:20 am

Fred2670 wrote:

tax the wealthy
then tax them again
and if they dont like it
tax them some more

Accomplishes nothing. Just gives the government more money to waste. (Do you think the government spends your money wisely? Do you really? Here's a list of government waste) in just 2008.

Only people who are into short-term revenge like the idea of taxing the hell out of the wealthy.
It might feel good in the moment, but in the long run it only hurts the economy, and that means it's the little guy that suffers.
(Who do you think runs out of food first if the economy crashes? The wealthy or the poor? Take your time.)

_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.

Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

10 Apr 2008, 10:35 am

Fred2670 wrote:

Warsie wrote:

Basically you said you would shoot all the liberals.

Yeah ok sorry for the confusion
I merely and figuratively embellished the rag

Get off the rag, Fred.

_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.

Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am

use_your_words wrote:

Ragtime wrote:

So, I wanted to ask those who are in favor of liberal policies why you choose not to just spontaneously be as liberal as possible.

Well, I'm really speaking to those on the left who, if perhaps only slowly, find that they continue to steadily drift left over time.
I'm asking them, essentially, "If you're going toward the far left anyway, what is the meaning behind the slow pace? Is it because it would bother you to accelerate that transition?"
Take sexuality. Few if any people want to be called a slut, even though 50 years from now "normal" sexual behaviour would be considered slu*ty if it were practiced now.
So, behaviour-x in the present = slu*ty, while behaviour-x in the future = normal.
So, how is behaviour-x slu*ty? Is it just a societal thing? So, everyone eventually doing "slu*ty" thing makes those things "normal", and not slu*ty?
This whole "Progressive Morals" thing just seems more like paced moral decline.
(Note the positive connotation in the word "progressive". It's called "progress" to slowly become less moral.

_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.

Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

10 Apr 2008, 11:00 am

use_your_words wrote:

I mean, people don't generally just choose to be "liberal" or "conservative" (at least, not as far as I know). They have opinions on certain issues, and then derive their ideology from those opinions, not the other way around. If someone shares a more liberal point of view on most issues, and then a conservative point of view on a few, why should they sacrifice what they believe about those few issues just to spontaneously be as liberal as possible?

Actually, on some level, people do. These issues don't exist in a void, but rather all fit together in a conceptual framework for society, and I would argue that ideology often can start first it is just that it becomes recognized through the positions taken.

Fred2670
Deinonychus

Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 305
Location: USA

10 Apr 2008, 3:46 pm

Ragtime wrote:

people who are into short-term revenge like the idea of taxing the hell out of the wealthy. It might feel good in the moment, but in the long run it only hurts the economy, and that means it's the little guy that suffers.

people who aquire their wealth by oppressing the little guy would certainly agree with this philosphy.

I believe those who have profited the most from a system, where the gap continues to widen between the haves and have nots, should shoulder a larger share of taxation. If when increasing a profit margin, you take food off the table of the less fortunate and clothes off their childrens backs you should also fund social programs and nonprofit organizations that aid their welfare. How else (besides importing foreign migrants) would you maintain your labor pool?

_________________
ALT+F4=Life

Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

10 Apr 2008, 4:06 pm

Fred2670 wrote:

If when increasing a profit margin, you take food off the table of the less fortunate and clothes off their childrens backs you should also fund social programs and nonprofit organizations that aid their welfare. How else (besides importing foreign migrants) would you maintain your labor pool?

How many instances do people increase a profit margin by taking away food and clothes from others? I'd like to see the company that finds such thefts to be an effective business strategy. Perhaps I am taking you too literally, but really, I don't think that there is a problem maintaining labor pools nor do I think that labor pool management is something that businesses would be *that* concerned about.

Fred2670
Deinonychus

Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 305
Location: USA

10 Apr 2008, 4:41 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:

How many instances do people increase a profit margin by taking away food and clothes from others?

It happens all the time. The "others" happen to be what we commonly referr to as "employees" and the absent food and clothes represent low and stagnant wages. Cmon Aweglor did you really need me to spell that out for you? Connect the dots baby.

_________________
ALT+F4=Life

Warsie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Apr 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,542
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

10 Apr 2008, 5:24 pm

Ragtime wrote:

They want to be "mainstream" but still be in "the forefront".

_________________
I am a Star Wars Fan, Warsie here.
Masterdebating on chi-city's south side.......!

Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

10 Apr 2008, 7:13 pm

Fred2670 wrote:

But technically the conceptual problem is that these wage issues aren't issues of theft. Low and stagnant wages are a problem of bargaining power, and bargaining power relates more to labor market conditions than necessarily profit margins. Jobs exist for the sake of profit margins really. The reason I wanted you to spell this out is so that way I had an analytical framework to work with rather than some vague statement.

Deus_ex_machina
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 May 2006
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,342
Location: Australia

10 Apr 2008, 7:27 pm

Fred2670 wrote:

The correct word is "Waterboarding", saying "Gun" just confuses him.

_________________
"They do, but what do you think is on the radio? Meat sounds. You know how when you slap or flap meat, it makes a noise? They talk by flapping their meat at each other. They can even sing by squirting air through their meat." - Terry Bisson

Fred2670
Deinonychus

Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 305
Location: USA

11 Apr 2008, 2:13 am

Awesomelyglorious wrote:

The reason I wanted you to spell this out is so that way I had an analytical framework to work with rather than some vague statement.

o ok no problem
Im sure coming up with an analytical clockwise spin
is easier than a solution to the problem

_________________
ALT+F4=Life

Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

11 Apr 2008, 2:15 am

Fred2670 wrote:

o ok no problem
Im sure coming up with an analytical clockwise spin
is easier than a solution to the problem

Easier than a solution, and easier to get a solution when you have the proper spin too.

Page 2 of 5 [ 69 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next

Jump to:

Democrats and liberals: Why are you not more liberal? Post Reply New Topic

Democrats and liberals: Why are you not more liberal?