Page 2 of 2 [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

26 Jul 2008, 2:37 pm

oscuria wrote:
In my mind a secular nation is better (secular as in free to worship and not freedom from worship).

I take secularism for both, freedom to worship AND freedom from worship.

Quote:
If a theocratic government took over then which religion would be in charge?
should?

Scientology, of course. ;)


Awesomelyglorious wrote:
The correct religion. Which religion is the correct religion? Your religion, because you would not choose to believe something without believing it is true. (Note, I do not specifically mean "You, oscuria" but rather the generic you, being that object selected)

By the object selected you mean the majority? That would mean that the "correct" religion would tend to be what the majority of people follow most. Unless the religion is an imposition from the government but that would seem to be a dictatorship. Although some would consider a theocracy as a form of tyranny.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

26 Jul 2008, 2:54 pm

Malsane wrote:
I think the problem is that humans are hypocrites. I find Christianity to be hypocritical by nature, and as most Americans are Christian, the possibility for hypocrisy is pretty wide.

Different thoughts from Christianity have their contradictions even if it is from the same denomination but from different backgrounds, Christianity ideologies differ from different cultures, american Christianity is looked to be either hyprocrisy or contradictory in certain aspects according to the point of view of Christians from other cultures (some have stated USA to be the New Babylon, and it makes sense :P) they would consider the original ideology of Christianity (original teachings from Jesus) while american conservative Christians believe theirs is the best and that let's say Europe, is not as moral as theirs. Different interpretations and new ones have form in the passage of time and within different cultures.

Some aspects that look to be contradictory and to be hypocrisy for some in american Conservative Christianity is: gun ownership supporters that happen to be christians, support of the war on Irak, issues related to immigration, death penalty to some (liberal christians in that case), strong on capitalism (considering that heaven is a socialist utopia, something curious), but then, interpretations of a religion change to go according to what it suits better for a government or culture, depending on their reality I would assume.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

26 Jul 2008, 4:25 pm

greenblue wrote:
By the object selected you mean the majority? That would mean that the "correct" religion would tend to be what the majority of people follow most. Unless the religion is an imposition from the government but that would seem to be a dictatorship. Although some would consider a theocracy as a form of tyranny.

I mean, the individual, not the majority. Individuals have ideologies, groups are only influenced by them. To be honest, what is the issue with a tyranny of goodness? If the religion is not good, then why do you follow it? If the religion is good, then why shouldn't it control the government? If the government is not acceptable to the religion, why allow for it to exist?