The system is gonna collapse, doo dah, doo dah...
DentArthurDent
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia
Yours is mediocre and arrogant. No substance. Just talk like: "Yeah well, all the communist states which call themselves communist aren't really communist because communism doesn't work that way. Karl Marx wrote a book on communism yet the people who read it do not properly apply communism because if it did it wouldn't fail like these so-called communist states. If only people knew that communist states are not actually communist more people would be in support of communism because communism, as an ideal, is practical."
Just crap.
Yes stupid and simplistic, so I started you off with a simple concept that for communism to work it needs an educated working class, no substance, think about the implications of an uneducated peasantry trying to come to terms with such a complex idea as communism whilst in the case of Russia being invaded by the armies of imperial and capitalist europe . Arrogant maybe, excuse, sick and tired of the same uninformed, ignorant comments. It is one thing to disagree with something you understand it is quite another to have a point of view on something you know nothing about
_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams
"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx
Karl thought that by providing a worker's paradise, he could force the evolution of the perfect worker. What he failed to fully account for was human greed, covetousness, and a general lust for power over others.
Socialism is more stable, but it tends to stagnate or even stifle personal initiative.
Captalism embraces what Communism rejects, and vice-versa.
^^ All simplistic ideas, but they're essentially correct.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
DentArthurDent
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia
Nature VS Nurture. This is why Marx believed it had to come from an educated working class, the concept is difficult and needs time to be fully understood. Put VERY simply Russia had no chance the peasantry were revolting against a system that had failed them, but they did not fully understand what the Bolshevik and communism needed for success add to that the invasion by European forces and the need to defend the country you have a recipe for disaster. Many of the leaders of the party were killed on the frontlines and the time to educate the population of the perils of what could happen passed. This allowed Stalin to increase the powers of what was a fairly minor posistion to one where he became a dictator, with very little organised opposition.
I do not know if socialism/communism can work but I do not agree with the nature defeats nurture argument. As a species we have modified our behaviour significantly when the correct education and support is in place. As someone has already pointed out maybe we should look to Scandinavian countries for a starting point. They generally have a more socially empathetic view, where once they were marauding, raping, pillaging vikings
_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams
"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU6PamCQ6zw[/youtube]
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson
ARRRGH you people know nothing of communism, China, Cuba, Russia and the rest were an aberration of the ideals of communism as set down by Karl Marx. We have never had a communist county
Check out http://www.wsws.org
the die-hard laissez-fair capitalists are saying that the current system failed because it wasn't pure enough capitalism.
Most of the time the middle road is the best. We've swung too far towards laissez fair, but trying to make a pure communist state (or even one as close as existed in Russia, China, et. all, is not the answer.
DentArthurDent
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia
I know little about their systems other that they seem a bit less socially corrupt, any chance you could expand upon your post?
_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams
"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx
I know little about their systems other that they seem a bit less socially corrupt, any chance you could expand upon your post?
I had a good article about it somewhere but seems to have been taken off the net. to be edited...
*edit*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model
The Nordic Model.pdf
that's about it, I have loads of papers on that from uni but that would bore the hell out of you ;p
I think that the fact that there's no corruption is more related to scandinavian mentality and not economics though.
_________________
not a bug - a feature.
Hm, noticed some people on here rapping on about unfettered capitalism and a socialist state. I'd have to conclude you know zero about what caused the actual problems Wall Street is experiencing and why specifically there is zero credit and the market fell 777 points the other day, an historical record. It's pretty complicated to read about, let alone right about, but there's an article on CNN Money.com that goes into it, it's title something to do with 55 trillion. That is, 55 trillion in credit default swaps and other derivatives, more than the whole worlds GDP. In other words,as some economists would put it even conservative ones, it was just pure gambling, gambling that was unregulated, and practically invisible to any regulatory body, although some of them had an idea that it was going on, but did nothing. If you gamble, you take a chance of winning big or losing big, and these hyper-educated Wall STreeters ended up losing. They're still losing and will continue to lose until the market, the real one, the one that can work actually, without all this speculation in derivatives and mortgage securities, goes into a bearish hidey-hole to lick its wounds and heal. It's not about upheaval, or about losing civilization, but about a true market economy reasserting itself, with regulations and oversight to keep safety checks in place, the kind you need during a football match, meaning soccer, so that the refs can keep the game moving forward constructively. There will be some hardship, but our system, without the derivative speculators, could be a good one, as long as it has referees available to keep the match above board and honest.
True capitalism is not greedy shmucks run amuck, nor is true socialism the disorganized, paranoid dictatorships of cuba, old china and the Soviet Union. Those states collapsed because of the same idealogical reason our market just collapsed in on itself: the weight of BlllSh$#%^t will eventually collapse any system in which it has had a hand in building. Truth is painful, as will be the gradual rebuilding of our markets, under oversight and regulation to protect everyone, even the greedy schmucks.
Exactly.
There is one fact, though, that is mitigating for some of those who bought mortgage securities: the companies that rate how secure investments are rated all mortgages the same, "AAA" or something like that, so to an uneducated investor it looked like a good, secure deal.
I just heard the other day on the news a reference to 'stock market futures...' essentially, there's a market for betting on the market. Unbelievable. It almost makes me long for the days of gambling parlors on every street - at least it was obvious then who the addictive gamblers were.
New York Times article from 1999:
By STEVEN A. HOLMES
In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.
The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.
Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.
In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.
''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''
Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.
In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.
''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''
Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.
Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.
Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.
Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.
In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.
Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.
In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.
The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.
Now we know how and when it all started.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
And there never shall be one, because Communism ignores fundamental aspects of human nature. It's pie-in-the-sky out-of-touch utopianism that could only be believed in by someone who cannot or refuses to understand how the majority of people's minds actually work.
That should make it pretty popular among us, shouldn't it. Of course, Libertarianism shares the same flaws, so it would also be likely to be rather popular among Aspergics.
It took me decades to learn these fundamental aspects of human nature. No pure system of economics can work in the real world.
ARRRGH you people know nothing of communism, China, Cuba, Russia and the rest were an aberration of the ideals of communism as set down by Karl Marx. We have never had a communist county
that's what all "communists" say but you guys lack the basic perception of reality to see that those countries ARE what communism turns into when it's implemented.
you can't cite a "real" example of communism outside of hippie colonies because there won't be a real example because it only works with hippie colonies.
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson
