"Likely to do physical harm to another"

Page 2 of 2 [ 19 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2

Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,048
Location: North of Atlanta, South of Boston, East of the Mississippi, and West of the Atlantic

17 Dec 2005, 8:38 am

Remanant,
that bill isnt a 9-11 spin off, its been debated for longer than that. the reason? To keep "unstable" people from buying weapons. If I were unstable I'd get my guns and knifes on the balckmarket anyhow....
Its the other implications I worry about...

Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,750

17 Dec 2005, 9:14 am

Ladysmokeater wrote:

To me it's another slice off our civil rights. Self-defense is a civil right.

Ladysmokeater
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,048
Location: North of Atlanta, South of Boston, East of the Mississippi, and West of the Atlantic

17 Dec 2005, 10:14 am

agreed, but it didnt come from the 9-11 stuff was what I was saying....

Page 2 of 2 [ 19 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2

Jump to:

"Likely to do physical harm to another" Post Reply New Topic

"Likely to do physical harm to another"