Of what real value is evolutionary "knowledge"?

Page 20 of 22 [ 352 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next

Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

13 May 2008, 3:33 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
It's not about feeling as I do; it's about teachers singling out Christians in the class and making
fun of their belief in God, and their disbelief that man evolved from lower species and even dead matter.
There is little in this world that is more worthy of doubt than that man came from dead matter,
and yet students are not allowed to doubt this. And if they do doubt it, they are required to
pretend that they don't -- which means they are required to lie.
So, that's the modern science classroom for you: "Doubters of abiogenesis, and believers in God
creating us: either recant or you fail!"

My Biology teacher is a Christian, you stud. You think he was "singling out Christians and making fun of their belief in God?"


No, I don't. I think he is one of the obvious exceptions to my general statement.

I'm pretty sure all of the biology teachers at my high school are Christian. And it's a public school, too. College biology professors I've met are also Christian, so knock this nonsense off. You are projecting.

Ragtime wrote:
Orwell wrote:
And no one is required to lie, and no one's grade is affected by saying they don't believe in evolution.


Telling two more lies won't help. :|
[/quote]
I've listened to people challenge my bio teacher on evolution multiple times. He patiently attempts to explain the evidence to them, but when it becomes obvious that they aren't interested in such a discussion, he shrugs it off and moves on. No one's grade has ever been adversely affected by these statements. If you can pass the tests, and you can do the lab work, you'll pass the class. That's how science classes work. It's only really in the humanities and liberal arts where you can get a lower grade for disagreeing with the teacher.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

13 May 2008, 3:34 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Ever hear of teachers overstepping their bounds as educators, and making extraneous and even bogus claims in the classroom?
Have you EVER heard of that? If you haven't, then you neither read nor watch the news.
At this point, this is just willful blindness of your part, I have to believe.


people go to college because they want to be there... they enroll in classes they want to take.

if you don't want a full education... don't go to a liberal arts school... and if you do go to a liberal arts school, you can take alternatives to intro bio courses... you can take intro geo, physics, chemistry,astronamy... whatever... they just wanna make sure you get a term or two of SOME science....

and if you're a bio major... you had better get to know your enemy...



Hmm, I'm more in favor of teachers being reprimanded for teaching students known falsehoods,
such as that "Man came from apes" is a fact, which hasn't been proven, or even roughly shown.
But hey, that's just me.

Whereas you're for "getting to know your enemy", rather than realizing that the enemy can be corrected and/or removed
to be replaced with a teacher who teaches facts as facts and opinions as opinions.
Where do you get the idea that numbskull teachers deserve to be tolerated,
while their students learn crap from them?


cause i have a more stringent definition of crap.


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Odin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,475
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

13 May 2008, 3:35 pm

Orwell wrote:
My Biology teacher is a Christian, you dolt. You think he was "singling out Christians and making fun of their belief in God?" How many people mock their own religion? And no one is required to lie, and no one's grade is affected by saying they don't believe in evolution.

Get over your delusions of persecution, Ragtime. For the last time, NOT ALL EVOLUTIONIST ARE ATHEIST.


Ragtime is sounding Schizotypal, methinks he needs anti-psychotics.


_________________
My Blog: My Autistic Life


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

13 May 2008, 3:38 pm

Orwell wrote:
I'm pretty sure all of the biology teachers at my high school are Christian. And it's a public school, too. College biology professors I've met are also Christian, so knock this nonsense off. You are projecting.


they must be in the same support group as all these scientists who are living a lie just to keep their jobs.

bet they'll see each other in hell long before any atheists. (this is based off my own beliefs)


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

13 May 2008, 3:40 pm

Odin wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
i can see lots of tests that have been proven for evolution...


Look, when the teacher says, "As we all know, man evolved from apes," how is that a proven statement?


1. Fossils


Bad argument. Very bad. No complete fossils show a creature between ape and human.
And the very few partial fossils -- and they are very partial (like a single tooth) --
that we have are always lone. Never do we find 2, 10, 100, like we should for any actual
species that would have existed to bridge the gap between apes and humans.
Therefore, those lone, partial fossils are most likely stand-alone genetic anomolies
from another static species, either still in existance or extinct.

Odin wrote:
2. Genetic analysis


That "99%" DNA figure that scientists previously stated we had in common with chimps
has recently been revised to "90%", due to a previous mistake that scientists had made
in coming up with the original figure.
It was in a news article a few months ago which you probably saw.

Odin wrote:
This whole notion that teachers are "forced to lie" has no real existance outside of your paranoid mind.

Read what I wrote. I didn't say teachers are forced to lie (although that's true as well, in some cases),
I said that teachers force students to lie, by making them state facts they don't believe in as if they do --
facts which contradict their religions.
And this absolutely happens all over the country every day.

I've said it ten times -- because people keep somehow missing what I'm saying and asking for repeats --
and I'm going to say it every day on this forum, every time I'm asked, until readers get it.
:)

I won't give up on you!


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Last edited by Ragtime on 13 May 2008, 3:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

13 May 2008, 3:46 pm

Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
i can see lots of tests that have been proven for evolution...


Look, when the teacher says, "As we all know, man evolved from apes," how is that a proven statement?

Yet, if you refute it, either by raising your hand or writing that you reject that notion as fact,
you will be "corrected". That is to say, the teacher will tell you that you are incorrect,
thus covering up her initial lie with another lie.


if i asked a similar question in church... you'd point me to the bible...

i keep telling you to go out there and read science literature... you don't seemed too informed in this area... so if you like, i can give you some links to free online science journals.

if there's much interest, i can post them on the forum... i'm not @ my personal pc atm and don't have bookmarks infront of me


You're all over the map, on unrelated stuff. You refuse to acknoledge what I wrote. You just don't want to see that
teachers are making students lie by making them assent, over and over again in the course of a class,
to the notion that man came from apes. You just won't admit this is what's going on in the classroom.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

13 May 2008, 3:51 pm

Orwell wrote:
I've listened to people challenge my bio teacher on evolution multiple times. He patiently attempts to explain the evidence to them, but when it becomes obvious that they aren't interested in such a discussion, he shrugs it off and moves on. No one's grade has ever been adversely affected by these statements. If you can pass the tests, and you can do the lab work, you'll pass the class. That's how science classes work. It's only really in the humanities and liberal arts where you can get a lower grade for disagreeing with the teacher.


Maybe that's how things work in your particular school, but I'm sure that somewhere along
the way of filling out the tests, you're going to have to say or directly imply that man came
from apes, or that abiogenesis occurred -- two claims which NO ONE CAN POSSIBLY KNOW.
It's just its own little religion, plain and simple. Say the incantations even though you may not believe them,
or you're out.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Last edited by Ragtime on 14 May 2008, 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Kalister1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,443

13 May 2008, 3:55 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Orwell wrote:
I've listened to people challenge my bio teacher on evolution multiple times. He patiently attempts to explain the evidence to them, but when it becomes obvious that they aren't interested in such a discussion, he shrugs it off and moves on. No one's grade has ever been adversely affected by these statements. If you can pass the tests, and you can do the lab work, you'll pass the class. That's how science classes work. It's only really in the humanities and liberal arts where you can get a lower grade for disagreeing with the teacher.


Maybe that's how things work in your particular school, but I'm sure that somewhere along
the way of filling out the tests, you're going to have to say or directly imply that man came
from apes, or that biogenesis occurred -- two claims which NO ONE CAN POSSIBLY KNOW.
It's just its own little religion, plain and simple. Say the incantations even though you may not believe them,
or you're out.


Just keeps spewing your rhetoric.



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

13 May 2008, 3:56 pm

Odin wrote:
Orwell wrote:
My Biology teacher is a Christian, you dolt. You think he was "singling out Christians and making fun of their belief in God?" How many people mock their own religion? And no one is required to lie, and no one's grade is affected by saying they don't believe in evolution.

Get over your delusions of persecution, Ragtime. For the last time, NOT ALL EVOLUTIONIST ARE ATHEIST.


Ragtime is sounding Schizotypal, methinks he needs anti-psychotics.


Oh my, an ad hominem attack from a liberal! I'm shocked! :o




:lol:


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

13 May 2008, 4:04 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Odin wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
i can see lots of tests that have been proven for evolution...


Look, when the teacher says, "As we all know, man evolved from apes," how is that a proven statement?


1. Fossils


Bad argument. Very bad. No complete fossils show a creature between ape and human.
And the very few partial fossils -- and they are very partial (like a single tooth) --
that we have are always lone. Never do we find 2, 10, 100, like we should for any actual
species that would have existed to bridge the gap between apes and humans.
Therefore, those lone, partial fossils are most likely stand-alone genetic anomolies
from another static species, either still in existance or extinct.

Odin wrote:
2. Genetic analysis


That "99%" DNA figure that scientists previously stated we had in common with chimps
has recently been revised to "90%", due to a previous mistake that scientists had made
in coming up with the original figure.
It was in a news article a few months ago which you probably saw.

Odin wrote:
This whole notion that teachers are "forced to lie" has no real existance outside of your paranoid mind.

Read what I wrote. I didn't say teachers are forced to lie (although that's true as well, in some cases),
I said that teachers force students to lie, by making them state facts they don't believe in as if they do --
facts which contradict their religions.
And this absolutely happens all over the country every day.

I've said it ten times -- because people keep somehow missing what I'm saying and asking for repeats --
and I'm going to say it every day on this forum, every time I'm asked, until readers get it.
:)

I won't give up on you!


1) you first statement is result of a misconception... there is no IN BETWEEN... evolution isn't that simplistically linear... there were several species evolving at the same time and many of them looked similar and had similar niches (it's reciprocal with how they look in a way... form=function)... these species compete and some die.... and mutations make very minute changes that take a long time to show changes... so you're never gonna get the play by play in the fossil record... which is why we use molecular biology from many angles to find agreements on lineages.

2) that's just utter crap... give me your article citing. we're ~98% chimps and somehtin like 95-96% to mice proven by MANY studies both current and old... and so what? are you gonna accept the 90% or are you merely using this as a ploy to show inconsistency?


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

13 May 2008, 4:10 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
i can see lots of tests that have been proven for evolution...


Look, when the teacher says, "As we all know, man evolved from apes," how is that a proven statement?

Yet, if you refute it, either by raising your hand or writing that you reject that notion as fact,
you will be "corrected". That is to say, the teacher will tell you that you are incorrect,
thus covering up her initial lie with another lie.


if i asked a similar question in church... you'd point me to the bible...

i keep telling you to go out there and read science literature... you don't seemed too informed in this area... so if you like, i can give you some links to free online science journals.

if there's much interest, i can post them on the forum... i'm not @ my personal pc atm and don't have bookmarks infront of me


You're all over the map, on unrelated stuff. You refuse to acknoledge what I wrote. You just don't want to see that
teachers are making students lie by making them assent, over and over again in the course of a class,
to the notion that man came from apes. You just won't admit this is what's going on in the classroom.


it's not unrelated...

you'll never understand it cause you don't try. you're like an atheist standing before god begging not to go to hell... but have never read the bible, despite knowing of it's existence.

you say it's not fact... i disagree... but i also disagree with how you say it's being taught.... maybe in degree vs kind... but still.

oh well.


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Odin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,475
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

13 May 2008, 4:45 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Odin wrote:
Orwell wrote:
My Biology teacher is a Christian, you dolt. You think he was "singling out Christians and making fun of their belief in God?" How many people mock their own religion? And no one is required to lie, and no one's grade is affected by saying they don't believe in evolution.

Get over your delusions of persecution, Ragtime. For the last time, NOT ALL EVOLUTIONIST ARE ATHEIST.


Ragtime is sounding Schizotypal, methinks he needs anti-psychotics.


Oh my, an ad hominem attack from a liberal! I'm shocked! :o




:lol:


It isn't an ad-hom attack when it's obvious to everyone that your perception of reality is distorted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizotypa ... y_disorder
Quote:
The American Psychiatric Association's DSM-IV-TR, a widely used manual for diagnosing mental disorders, defines Schizotypal personality disorder as "A pervasive pattern of social and interpersonal deficits marked by acute discomfort with, and reduced capacity for, close relationships as well as by cognitive or perceptual distortions and eccentricities of behavior, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

1. Ideas of reference (excluding delusions of reference)
2. Odd beliefs or magical thinking that influences behavior and is inconsistent with subcultural norms (e.g., superstitiousness, belief in clairvoyance, telepathy, or "sixth sense"; in children and adolescents, bizarre fantasies or preoccupations)
3. Unusual perceptual experiences, including bodily illusions
4. Odd thinking and speech (e.g., vague, circumstantial, metaphorical, overelaborate, or stereotyped)
5. Suspiciousness or paranoid ideation
6. Inappropriate or constricted affect
7. Behavior or appearance that is odd, eccentric, or peculiar
8. Lack of close friends or confidants other than first-degree relatives
9. Social anxiety that tends to be associated with paranoid fears rather than negative judgments about self


_________________
My Blog: My Autistic Life


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

13 May 2008, 5:38 pm

it teaches you to be able to spot the fakes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjcCafRmGm8

lol


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

13 May 2008, 6:57 pm

I have recently decided what Ragtime's species is. It is a small subspecies of man, Homo Sapiens Coprocephalus.

This subspecies is fast coming extinct, and unless action is taken now, we will lose biodiversity. While their exterior appearance is the same as Homo Sapiens Sapiens, their brains are susceptible more than usual to virulent memes, which cause extraordinary sclerosis of the prefrontal lobes and the amygdala, as well as perverting the function of the nucleus accumbens to unusual reward pathways.

We need to find a preserve, somewhere that these specimens can roam freely without harming anyone else....

I'd suggest the Australian Outback, but it may be too hot for them, even though their brains seem to be used mostly for cooling blood.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

13 May 2008, 7:09 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Orwell wrote:
I've listened to people challenge my bio teacher on evolution multiple times. He patiently attempts to explain the evidence to them, but when it becomes obvious that they aren't interested in such a discussion, he shrugs it off and moves on. No one's grade has ever been adversely affected by these statements. If you can pass the tests, and you can do the lab work, you'll pass the class. That's how science classes work. It's only really in the humanities and liberal arts where you can get a lower grade for disagreeing with the teacher.


Maybe that's how things work in your particular school, but I'm sure that somewhere along
the way of filling out the tests, you're going to have to say or directly imply that man came
from apes, or that biogenesis occurred -- two claims which NO ONE CAN POSSIBLY KNOW.
It's just its own little religion, plain and simple. Say the incantations even though you may not believe them,
or you're out.

First, you can't even keep your terminology straight. Biogenesis, "life from life," is the normal mode of reproduction (indeed the only observed one) for all living things. If you don't know that biogenesis occurred, you must doubt your own birth. And my class didn't really delve much into human evolution, because that subject is harder to settle than other matters within evolutionary biology. Contrary to your paranoid ravings, we do NOT teach unconfirmed things as fact. There was a brief interlude into some of the current ideas about human origins, but even our textbook (which is standard all over the country) made clear that the specifics they mentioned about human evolution are tentative because there isn't as much fossil evidence for Homo Sapiens as they would like to base their ideas off of. I don't recall human evolution ever being on a test.

Quote:
You just won't admit this is what's going on in the classroom.

Frankly, I think many of us here have been in the classroom more recently than yourself, so we can say with more certainty how the material is being presented.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


monty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,741

13 May 2008, 8:07 pm

Ragtime wrote:
You just won't admit this is what's going on in the classroom.


We biology initiates can be frank and open, but only after the secret handshakes are exchanged and the perimeter is secure.