MatchboxVagabond wrote:
the lack of any sort of interest in learning was probably the bigger issue. Somebody has to run the businesses and do the work if you want any sort of economic activity to be happening and if you take productive land and hand it to people that are just going to live on it, you need to find some way of replacing that economic output.
I think this happened in Kenya and Zimbabwe as well. Land appropriation resulting in economic collapse. In South east Asia the nationalisation of business from the hands of the Chinese was attempted in both Malaysia and Indonesia in the 1950s and 60s but eventually British educated local leadership was appointed that understood that for these countries to be integrated into the international economy, the Chinese need to be left alone to manage the business sector.
While Indonesia is still lagging, the Malaysian economy has surged and while both countries do have oil and gas, the Chinese were left alone. Meanwhile African countries have lagged behind everyone. South Africa is miles ahead as the wealthiest nation. It's a shame that the ANC is going down the route taken by Mugabe and others in Africa.
I don't dispute the British rigged the situation in South Africa, especially keeping hold of 75% of the land in white owned hands. the problem was the black population was already in a state of being a servant class and for those whom education offers a way out, it seems the entrepreneurial class are either exiting the country or making deals with ANC mafia.