Page 3 of 4 [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,056
Location: MO

23 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm

Spread da luv! Image


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

23 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm

preferably- no humans. androids would be ok though.

version with humans- devoid of all the sad evolutionary side effects, like blindly believing in fairy tales, only altruistic towards certain groups (nations, races). and most of all- not meaning what they say and not saying what they mean.


_________________
not a bug - a feature.


ZEGH8578
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,532

23 Mar 2009, 3:11 pm

anna-banana wrote:
preferably- no humans. androids would be ok though.

version with humans- devoid of all the sad evolutionary side effects, like blindly believing in fairy tales, only altruistic towards certain groups (nations, races). and most of all- not meaning what they say and not saying what they mean.


blindly believing in fairy tales is a side effect of the abstract thought that helps us develop tools.

you cant have the cake and eat it too, you know >:I WHY you cant, i dunno... i see people eating their cake all the time :(

we have an expression here, "you cant get it in bags and sacks"
a friend of mine, would yell out, proclaiming "i want it in bags and sacks!! !"

wth am i talking about :(


_________________
''In the world I see - you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center.''


anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

23 Mar 2009, 3:20 pm

ZEGH8578 wrote:
anna-banana wrote:
preferably- no humans. androids would be ok though.

version with humans- devoid of all the sad evolutionary side effects, like blindly believing in fairy tales, only altruistic towards certain groups (nations, races). and most of all- not meaning what they say and not saying what they mean.


blindly believing in fairy tales is a side effect of the abstract thought that helps us develop tools.

you cant have the cake and eat it too, you know >:I WHY you cant, i dunno... i see people eating their cake all the time :(

we have an expression here, "you cant get it in bags and sacks"
a friend of mine, would yell out, proclaiming "i want it in bags and sacks!! !"

wth am i talking about :(


LOL I agree with you. but in the perfect world, we would be able to have our cakes! and eat them!

and anyway, if Schrödinger's cat (click) can be both dead and alive at the same time, then I guess we are both wrong :p


_________________
not a bug - a feature.


Magnus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,372
Location: Claremont, California

25 Mar 2009, 12:57 pm

Quote:
Magnus wrote:
I wish that we would all be able to read each others minds and not have to talk.

Sand wrote:
And the result would probably be pandemic murder and insanity. Probably the only thing that keeps the world somewhat stable is human hypocrisy and a natural talent for lying.


Human hypocrisy and lying does allow for human cooperation however, in reality it just makes people neurotic. This neurosis causes a whole host of other issues. Also, humans already commit murder on a grand scale and then lie or pretend like it's justified or not real. If we were forced to confront ourselves honestly and each other truthfully, then we wouldn't get away with this.


_________________
As long as man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of lower living beings he will never know health or peace. For as long as men massacre animals, they will kill each other.

-Pythagoras


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm

Magnus wrote:
Quote:
Magnus wrote:
I wish that we would all be able to read each others minds and not have to talk.

Sand wrote:
And the result would probably be pandemic murder and insanity. Probably the only thing that keeps the world somewhat stable is human hypocrisy and a natural talent for lying.


Human hypocrisy and lying does allow for human cooperation however, in reality it just makes people neurotic. This neurosis causes a whole host of other issues. Also, humans already commit murder on a grand scale and then lie or pretend like it's justified or not real. If we were forced to confront ourselves honestly and each other truthfully, then we wouldn't get away with this.


Humans are twisted enough to figure out a way.



Averick
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,709
Location: My tower upon the crag. Yes, mwahahaha!

25 Mar 2009, 3:58 pm

Secondly, I'd split the landmass up to a nice 50/50 and say those for currancy live on the developed front, and those for bartering live on the non-polluted, self-sustaining portion (if such a thing exists anymore.) Somewhere they'd meet in the middle-- the new bohemians would produce food, the technological class would produce "safe" conveniences.



DNForrest
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,198
Location: Oregon

25 Mar 2009, 4:39 pm

I'd reduce the population to around 600 million, with whomever is to be part of the remaining humans being randomly selected. Pretty much solve most worldly issues with this.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

26 Mar 2009, 10:47 am

Sand wrote:
Magnus wrote:
I wish that we would all be able to read each others minds and not have to talk.


And the result would probably be pandemic murder and insanity. Probably the only thing that keeps the world somewhat stable is human hypocrisy and a natural talent for lying.

well, the question is, would it be necessarily the case?
Magnus' idea isn't bad, but somehow incomplete, we should also be able to feel each other emotions and sensations, especially pain, that should be very interesting.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Chibi_Neko
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,485
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

26 Mar 2009, 11:52 am

If there was only 1 thing I could do to change the world....
I would remove religion, many of the evils in the world are caused by it.


_________________
Humans are intelligent, but that doesn't make them smart.


Ladarzak
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Female
Posts: 337
Location: Vancouver, Canada

26 Mar 2009, 12:31 pm

> what kind of world do you want to live in

One with a lot less people in it, like a fraction of the present number, say 1/7. However, I can't advocate mass murder, so I would have to hope for some natural disaster that decreases the human reproductive rate. Then I would like to be alive at a different time when there are fewer people and more access to nature, so I would need a time machine.

I guess you meant something constructive to change the world today, but sadly I don't see any hope there. Inflicting my preferences on the world would just make me a dictator.



roadracer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Nov 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 778

26 Mar 2009, 7:57 pm

Ladarzak wrote:
I guess you meant something constructive to change the world today, but sadly I don't see any hope there. Inflicting my preferences on the world would just make me a dictator.


I tried to be vague with my question, so anyone could read it and answer however they like. Your answer can be whatever you want



phil777
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,825
Location: Montreal, Québec

26 Mar 2009, 9:43 pm

I have the best solution! Change all the religious people into androids so they only believe in logic >=^D Hahahaha XD



ZEGH8578
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,532

26 Mar 2009, 9:54 pm

phil777 wrote:
I have the best solution! Change all the religious people into androids so they only believe in logic >=^D Hahahaha XD


change?

no, replace! or... remove...

no... im getting those dark evil thoughts again :(


_________________
''In the world I see - you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center.''


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

26 Mar 2009, 10:06 pm

phil777 wrote:
I have the best solution! Change all the religious people into androids so they only believe in logic >=^D Hahahaha XD

Hmm.... those would either have to be rather complex androids or something, because people cannot even function without the use of some heuristic rather than a logical algorithm.



Magnus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,372
Location: Claremont, California

27 Mar 2009, 11:06 am

Quote:
Magnus wrote:
I wish that we would all be able to read each others minds and not have to talk.

Sand wrote:
And the result would probably be pandemic murder and insanity. Probably the only thing that keeps the world somewhat stable is human hypocrisy and a natural talent for lying.

Greenblue wrote:
well, the question is, would it be necessarily the case?
Magnus' idea isn't bad, but somehow incomplete, we should also be able to feel each other emotions and sensations, especially pain, that should be very interesting.


I agree with Greenblue. We would have to be completely telepathic for it to work.
Somehow I just assumed that we would be able to feel each others emotions as well.
_________________


_________________
As long as man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of lower living beings he will never know health or peace. For as long as men massacre animals, they will kill each other.

-Pythagoras