LadyMacbeth
Veteran
Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,091
Location: In the girls toilets at Hogwarts, washing the blood off my hands.
21 Sep 2009, 7:02 pm
21 Sep 2009, 7:10 pm
Fickle_Pickle
Veteran
Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 974
Location: North Hollywood, California
22 Sep 2009, 9:49 am
22 Sep 2009, 9:51 am
26 Sep 2009, 12:15 pm
26 Sep 2009, 12:53 pm
26 Sep 2009, 12:57 pm
28 Sep 2009, 7:41 am
I was on the implant for a while. (Implanon in europe?) It stopped everything till I took it out! You could try that?
Be a shame to wish something away when you may miss it a decade or two later. You sound young to make a decision when few teens actually want children.
I do know the feeling of hating periods. Seeing as how I love kids I plan on staying pregnant/lactating for quite some time. 
Also evening primrose oil and starflower oil are supposed to help hugely with symptoms! I'll be trying them when I actually have cycles again.
28 Sep 2009, 9:19 am
28 Sep 2009, 9:34 am
SINsister wrote:
Spazzergasm wrote:
that's very odd. so the nerves and stuff arent damaged on the g-spot and stuff?
seriously though that's......well id never want to do it.
seriously though that's......well id never want to do it.
That's a good question - I have no idea. Sadly, some women have no choice, depending on their current medical situations. Definitely worth investigating, though, because I have uterine fibroids that seem to be growing (:cry:), and my gyno's already brought up the subject of hysterectomy, based on the fibroids and my family's history of breast and ovarian cancers. So I'll go from an extremely-youthful 41 to 80 overnight?! F*ck that! There *has* to be some less-invasive/less-drastic alternative.
Most of the time there are alernative I'd find a new doctor for a second opition. The hormons they give you after a hysterectomy ore far mre likely to give you breast cancer then the ones that your ovaries make. Just make sure your doctor is aware of the family history and get a p.t. ever 6 months it's only once a year for women with out a stronge family history if caught early it's got a 94% cure rate. There is a drug the helps cut the rate of cancer in women with the gene for it get tested for this gene there are lots of kinds of cancer some run in familys some don't. You maybe lucky and not have this gene better to know then to not. Much luck and I hope you stay healthy
28 Sep 2009, 9:38 am
SINsister wrote:
Spazzergasm wrote:
that's very odd. so the nerves and stuff arent damaged on the g-spot and stuff?
seriously though that's......well id never want to do it.
seriously though that's......well id never want to do it.
That's a good question - I have no idea. Sadly, some women have no choice, depending on their current medical situations. Definitely worth investigating, though, because I have uterine fibroids that seem to be growing (:cry:), and my gyno's already brought up the subject of hysterectomy, based on the fibroids and my family's history of breast and ovarian cancers. So I'll go from an extremely-youthful 41 to 80 overnight?! F*ck that! There *has* to be some less-invasive/less-drastic alternative.
. what's a uterine fibroid? i hope you get it sorted out. i dont think theres anything wrong with mine at the moment. i had an fallopean cyst once, that hurt a lot.
yeah, it would be really sad if they lost any feeling due to getting their bits removed. i heard it can happen when people get their labia snipped off.
28 Sep 2009, 9:49 am
28 Sep 2009, 9:54 am
SINsister wrote:
Spazzergasm wrote:
what's a uterine fibroid? i hope you get it sorted out. i dont think theres anything wrong with mine at the moment. i had an fallopean cyst once, that hurt a lot.
yeah, it would be really sad if they lost any feeling due to getting their bits removed. i heard it can happen when people get their labia snipped off.
yeah, it would be really sad if they lost any feeling due to getting their bits removed. i heard it can happen when people get their labia snipped off.
Info on uterine fibroids:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibroids
No one in any civilized country snips off the external parts of women's genitalia, unless those parts have malignancies (vulvar cancer, etc.). Forced genital mutilation without women's consent is solely practiced by psychopathic subhumans, imho.
ouch!! i'm really sorry.
. can they remove them or something?
it's called hollywood, m'dear! oh, but it isnt forced, the women voluntarily risk losing sensation because they feel their ladybits are disgusting, since the porn industry says so.
28 Sep 2009, 10:07 am
Spazzergasm wrote:
ouch!! i'm really sorry. . can they remove them or something?
it's called hollywood, m'dear! oh, but it isnt forced, the women voluntarily risk losing sensation because they feel their ladybits are disgusting, since the porn industry says so.
. can they remove them or something?it's called hollywood, m'dear! oh, but it isnt forced, the women voluntarily risk losing sensation because they feel their ladybits are disgusting, since the porn industry says so.
There's a procedure by which the fibroids can be removed from the uterine walls, which are then sewn back together. Sounds repulsive, but it preserves the uterus. It's mainly done for women who are in their childbearing years, and want to be able to have kids. I don't want kids, which is another reason that my gyno's been blabbing about hysterectomy (get it all done in one fell swoop, yadda yadda). I really dunno. The cancer risks will probably always be with me, whether I get everything carved out or not. I'm far too vain to want to turn into an old bag overnight, though, so we'll see...
Are you talking about labiaplasty, in which the inner and outer labia are cut and shaped into a "youthful"-looking vulva? If so, I didn't realize that it removed nerves/sensation. Those women are nuts for undergoing that kind of surgery voluntarily, in that case. Bleurgh!
28 Sep 2009, 11:15 am
SINsister wrote:
Spazzergasm wrote:
ouch!! i'm really sorry. . can they remove them or something?
it's called hollywood, m'dear! oh, but it isnt forced, the women voluntarily risk losing sensation because they feel their ladybits are disgusting, since the porn industry says so.
. can they remove them or something?it's called hollywood, m'dear! oh, but it isnt forced, the women voluntarily risk losing sensation because they feel their ladybits are disgusting, since the porn industry says so.
There's a procedure by which the fibroids can be removed from the uterine walls, which are then sewn back together. Sounds repulsive, but it preserves the uterus. It's mainly done for women who are in their childbearing years, and want to be able to have kids. I don't want kids, which is another reason that my gyno's been blabbing about hysterectomy (get it all done in one fell swoop, yadda yadda). I really dunno. The cancer risks will probably always be with me, whether I get everything carved out or not. I'm far too vain to want to turn into an old bag overnight, though, so we'll see...
Are you talking about labiaplasty, in which the inner and outer labia are cut and shaped into a "youthful"-looking vulva? If so, I didn't realize that it removed nerves/sensation. Those women are nuts for undergoing that kind of surgery voluntarily, in that case. Bleurgh!
well, if i were you, i would want them removed. but that's because i do want kids eventually, and i saw a picture of them!! ! they are creepy looking
.
yes. i am. sorry, i sat here trying to remember the word for it- couldnt. :/. it does remove sensation in some cases, and you know a lot of sensation comes from the actual labia. i know. every woman gets self concious about her labia, in reality most of the women who feel like freaks and get labiaplasty done are utterly normal. it's sad.
28 Sep 2009, 1:43 pm
