Undeniable evidence JFK killed by 2nd shooter

Post Reply New Topic

In addition to the current testimonies there were eyewitnesses who swear about smoke from the grassy knoll and noise. Mary Moorman's photo. Mary took the closest photo to the president when he was shot, not only was her distance significant, but the photo she took is probably the closest to where the “fence shooter” would be. So she got a unique view of Dealey Plaza. Her photo was taken a FRACTION of a second after JFK was shot. This photo shows Kennedy's head just beginning to separate. When this photo was taken the shot was probably just starting to be heard. It is the only photo of his head exploding in the less then a second sequence where is brain matter was in the air.

Now while Mary's photo was examined by the Warren Commission, much later forensic analysis showed something other witnesses claimed about smoke coming from behind the grassy knoll and three figures. Here's the blown up image.



the photo corroborates Gorden Arnold (a member of the US military) was present at the shooting. Arnold and at least four other individuals said they met men who identified themselves as Secret Service agents. Arnold stated that he was attempting to move to the railroad bridge above the triple underpass to film the presidential limousine and motorcade when a man with a badge who said he was with the Secret Service told him that he could not be there.

According to Arnold in that interview, he moved to a dirt mound in front of the picket fence on the "grassy knoll" where he filmed the motorcade as it moved down Elm Street. He described at least one shot as being fired past his left ear from behind, stating that he "hit the dirt" after feeling the first just over his left shoulder, and that while lying down his impression was that at least one more shot came from that location,

They also ask tons about other BS things as well like Pizzagate and the alleged conspiracy to murder Epstein to protect his associates. Just because the "braintrust" in the capital is asking questions, doesn't mean that there's any legitimacy to it. We've known everything that's actually relevant for decades. Oswald worked at the book depository, he shot Kennedy twice as the procession drove past. He was subsequently killed by Jack Ruby who was regularly in the police station and had a known bad temper and affinity for the President.

Really, there is no mystery here. If there were an actual conspiracy here, we would know by now. People start talking over time, especially when they approach death and nothing. We haven't heard a word from anybody that's even remotely credible to indicate anything other than what we have known for decades. This is all a bunch of people looking at the evidence trying to reconcile the smallness of the effort to assassinate Kennedy with the bigness of the ultimate impact on history. But, big impacts on history can be the result of small events and changes. Had Napoleon opted to change the shoes on the horses to winter shoes before attacking Russia, it's quite possible that enough of his people would have survived to win the battle at Waterloo.

After the discussion and reading what evidence exists, it sure seems like the title is clickbait.

Anyway, an opportunity arose to re-examine the case based on the release of thousands of files. the issue of the new testimony being made under oath is why a doctor would lie about what they saw about the head wound.

The significance of Dr. Curtis’ testimony was threefold. First, he debunked the common falsehood that the doctors at Parkland Memorial Hospital did not have a chance to view the nature of JFK’s head wound in any detail.

Second, he documented for the record the intimidation tactics Warren Commission lawyers used to pressure Parkland doctors (and other fact witnesses) to conform their testimony to the pre-ordained conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald — firing from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository — was the lone assassin of President Kennedy.

third, Dr Curtis described under oath that Kennedy’s wounds as inconsistent with the findings of the Warren Commission, which was established by then-President Lyndon B. Johnson to investigate Kennedy’s killing. Critically Curtis, along with several other Parkland doctors, he said, thought the head wound was an entrance wound, not an exit one, which would mean more than one assassin.

How this is interpreted by congress is up to them. But to me this adds further doubt over the Warren Commission's findings.

Perhaps, I'm happy to change it to "Potential evidence JFK killed by 2nd shooter"

It's not necessary; you're entitled to use attention seeking headlines, it's the internet.

It's very hard to disentangle where the media is beating up a story pushing certain members of congress to canvass for the release of confidential files under FOI. And where the government and/or intelligence agencies have covered up and/or misinformed the public. At the end of the day everything (including your ^^^ information) is second hand. Sometimes third hand. On the internet we can surmise based on triangulation of disparate sources and either choose to go down the path of consensus or we find holes in the current narrative and fairly ask questions.