Epimonandas vs. Eamonn

Post Reply New Topic

Neither one of those two have any new data or profound insight, so neither one of them are eve going to win this. Give it up! Call it a stalemate!

Why hasn't Epimondas replied in this thread.
I will not find out the answer of this popularity contest untill Epimondas replies here.

touche,


What happened was that he voted 3 times.
3 and your gone.

He has been banned from this thread, he will be able to reply in another 12 days

5-5 would be the current popularity count #'s

I agree. I didn't like either of their arguments.

i'm just warning you, don't attatch yourself to that star.

What the hell are you talking about?? Why are you LYING about me? I dont care for LIERS.

I never felt i needed to, Eamon, is kind of full of himself. Does not seem to read or acknowledge anything i wrote in any of my threads. And people seem to say i do not offer facts, well, then you must not be reading my posts.

So tell me the third option you agree with? Tell me your opinion on the issue as it's very easy to judge when your on the sidelines. I think Eamonn has a great and well balanced argument myself.

From what i can see, Eamonn has looked at your argument and tore it to pieces with his own well put together case. You seem to have gotten yourself mixed up with Eamonn. You sir are full of baloney. Clear win for Eamonn IMHO.

No, that would be Eamonn who is full of baloney, apparently, you do not understand english very well. How else could you miss my points?

P.S. Its not nice to lie or insult, which apparently you are trying to do, to make me falsely believe that everything i have ever read, learned, or seen is false. Its not. The things I wrote when quoting data are true, you may be able to dismiss my oppinion of them, but by blatantly dismissing my whole side, you are also dismissing all the facts i presented and choose instead to believe in one whose main source of information, is errorneous, tom dick and harry no name non reputable internet sites. That is a falsity. His only other source he claims is CNN, which is often biased, and the one source he uses from CNN is from an editorial, where as mine is from an aritcle with data and facts supporting it.

Your points were nothing but a wish list. Every man and his dog knows that the US is the world's biggest polluter and that the CIA helped put Saddam and his party in to power, clearly you dont though.

If you dont even know the basic facts then dont try to convince people of your arguments otherwise. I understand english perfectly well and understand that you dont understand what you are talking about so give up before you make even more of a fool of yourself than you have already, savvy? Comprahende? Understand?

You started the lies and the insults with Eamonn and myself (you've done it tonight again) and the sad thing is you dont even realise it. You have quoted nothing but your own falsehoods and an out of date allied wish-list that even they admit to being wrong now. Where are your fact, show me the "credible" article that backs up your out of date propaganda.

Eamonn produced the facts from your own source (the BBC) that you didnt even understand wasnt backing up your argument about China being the worlds biggest polluter then he showedd you that it pointed out that the US was the biggest polluter and you then denied all knowledge. You are probably lying to yourself as well as the rest of us.

He offered to show you the CNN figures (that was a major study, widely accepted as the most accurate in the region) from many other news links including right-wing media but as usual you danced around the issue and came out with your usual mince. Son, even the allies and the right-wing media now are pointing out that your closed minded propaganda arguments arent true.

I understand you are being quite abrasive and are obviously in denial, just because my view differs from yours.

There. Fixed.

Once again you are misleading people. I do not know how you come up with your outrageous accusations. I never start any fights, i only finish them. Eamonn did more than i did and before i did, deal with it. If you can't handle the truth, do not take it out on me. His source from BBC was an editorial, how is an editorial, which is oppinion, prove for a fact that i was wrong??

Obviously you do not understand much about prime and secondary sources, which a personal oppinion like that is neither.

What many sources??? he quoted as his sources, the few times he did at all, mostly third rate non reputable internet sites, which does not prove anything, except that the person that made the site does not like the U.S. or does not like Bush. No proof there.


http://www.msnbc.com/news/307034.asp?cp1=1
http://www.guardian.co.uk/china/story/0 ... 46,00.html
http://atlas.aaas.org/atmos/air_popups.php?p=sulfur
http://www.cnsnews.com/facts/2005/facts2005314.asp
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/artic ... 3china.htm
http://www.usenet.com/newsgroups/rec.au ... 03341.html
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory ... /story.htm

You think the trollground (usenet) is a reliable source? I dontt see any of your many fly-by-night sources deny that the US is the worlds biggest single polluter (note: not just air polluter). The fact is most nations have to deal with it but the US is one of the few supposed democracies to refuse to deal with the issue of pollution and carbon emmisions internationally. They also expect other nations to agree to international laws and courts that they dont sign up to.

Eamonn started it and you finished it? Is that your mature debate? Didnt Eamonn let you have the last word on the "anti-american sentiment" thread then you insulted him here again. You sound like your obsessed over Eamonn's clear debating win and are in denial.