slowmutant wrote:
And why would anyone have to give up an engineering degree to have religion? These two areas are hardly mutually exclusive. But I won't belabour the question because it really doesn't matter to anyone except Fnord.
Read my previous post. That incident with the youth pastor is not an isolated one. Religious leaders everywhere are preaching against science and engineering, and simply because those disciplines rely on material evidence, rather than religious experiences and the feelings they induce.
Science is also about asking questions, which is anathema to religion, where you are expected to blindly believe, or have blind faith in everything you are told by religious leaders.
Science is about investigation, and not revelation. Scientists reach their conclusions after researching their questions, instead of waiting for a voice in their head to tell them what's real.
Science is self-correcting, whereas religion accepts contradictory statements as 'mysteries' or 'mysterious ways.'
Science encourages inquiry, investigation, and the presentation of evidence.
Religion encourages complacency, indoctrination, and repetition of rote dogma.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.