6/6/06 celebrations

Post Reply New Topic

I'll actually take the time to reply to you, as I think or rather I know your way off..

Firstly having a name such as 666 makes me tend to think this is not your first discriminations against Christians. Perhaps you did it just to get attention or to stand out with the "Evil number". I know people have the complex, its very cultural.

------------------------

BLAH

At this point you're just flinging the same tired insults with no good reason. Me, a bigot?

------------------------

I was not talking to you unless your emp, bigotry was a comparison, no where did I say anyone here was a bigot. Bigotry is a collective psychological force which was empowered by hate, just like emp does, hate and obviously, so it is and was a comparision for effect. There is no positive notes to what he says, it's purely anti-Christian or anti-anyone that believes in it. Entirely by my opinion hateful, discriminatory and entirely unjust including not fair.


---------------------------------------------------

BLAH

You're defending a religion that promotes unfair treatment of women, homosexuals, pagans, and the handicapped. If anyone here is a bigot, it's you. If someone tells you he thinks all races are below the Japanese, are you gonna tell him you respect his opinion? Hopefully you'll call him a racist idiot. Not all points of view are equally valid; bigots deserve no sympathy.

------------------------------------------------------------

What I am defending, which is not religion is the respectful treatment socially of others who happen to believe. Not how they believe, not the negatives but there existence on this forum which does not face a constant social instigation that is unwelcoming.

Do you see Christians coming in here making fun of and instigating people with A.S in general? I have observed so called “aspies” instigate and out right disrespect Christians.

In this day and age and even before it was not entirely true. Why is that? Women are self-empowered and just because establishment including government with blacks and slavery was as guilty if not more guilty then religion. Times have changed...

Separate church from the individual and you will appear more intelligent as well as agreeable to others. You like emp focus on the negatives and you fail to be balanced as well as a P.V of anti-Christianism.

Not true with homosexuals, you promote the idea they do. Just shows again your one of the ones unwilling, also with the 666 name to have any subjectivity or balance. There are homosexuals who are Christians as well as divided churches over the issue. There would be no division if Christians disagreed. Hey, seems to take some wind out of (power of what you say) in your most imbalanced and wrong approach to anyone considering your view.

Some universalistic churches have Christians as well as pagans in them. However paganism is not Christianity and there are many pagans that hate Christians and the other way around. Obviously differing beliefs will not like each other, so naturally they disagree...

I went around for some time in religious and spiritual rooms in my study that were voice chat. Pagans were fairly anti-Christian but I've also observed Christian Paganism where the two were combined. Sort of a New Age Christian combination and some without the tools of peganism but in Christian like concepts. This is the evolution of it in truth, you present only negatives out of balance and might just be ignorant of the truth.

Also Friends that were Christians as well as pagans...



----------------------------------

BLAH

I'm gonna excuse the medieval Christians because they didn't know any better, people back then believed in all sorts of crazy stuff. Magic, dragons, merfolk, leprechauns, God, ghosts, et cetera. I don't believe in elves though, do you? Supernatural beliefs had a good run, and they were fun, but come on man. Sometimes you've just gotta let it go.

P.S., If it's any consolation, I also think Satanism is dumb.

----------------------------------------

Believe it or not, there are Christians that indeed do not or cannot believe in the supernatural. They are more so involved with values and morals as well as the attempt to follow the teachings Christ put forth. It’s very cultural; many people here have grandparents or some family member that happens to believe in Christianity on this forum.

Oh yeah, there are also Christians on this forum likely reading your reply..

Might get emp going again for some trash talk...

Mr. 666 wants to portray saints as hateful people who don't like the handicapped. Just think of mother Terressa folks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_Teresa

They pray to god to help people that are sick and disabled. Also I know one church actually paying for an apartment for a disabled family. The daughter has A.S.

Your just way off guy or whatever your gender is.. I think it's really messed up, your view that is.

From my reading the Romans used to throw handicapped children from cliffs, when Christianity came around, the treatment of the disabled improved.

Ok guys it's time to shake hands and give it a rest. EMP has started the crap in this topic, sc you picked it up and are trying to make people take sides and now everyones going at each other. Let's not have anymore of this wasteful and pointless verbal slugfest and cool off. Go help some people in The Haven

This might be an autism forum, but people with autism and there families might be Christian. Well some are... Your bashing is much more subtle, also you’re ignoring numerous occurrences when it happens. There is the few, yes including yourself with your way out of balance attack against Christianity.

If it was hate against Muslims, Buddhist or another faith I'd stand up against such trash talk as well.

You wrote your response, I pointed it out and now you’re backing away from the obvious. Which might mean I just startled you a bit and now your not targeting the garden variety Christian, a good deflection.

I'd hope it being pointed out would help you consider considering your words in the future, there are better ways to criticize constructively. Obviously in your reply your backing away from it, which is good and it was obvious in your words.. Negatives more negatives and yes all negatives.

The number was not random, your not a random number generator and the number is like consciously picking 911 or the famous 666. Well it is 666, nothing random about it.

You typed 666 three times in a row and not a random number like 867 or 273 like I just did. There is nothing random by pushing the obvious sequence that is not random and by choice.

Unless you picked 666 randomly from any other name, it's still 666 which requires some sort of previous thought and consideration concerning the number. How about the not so random name you decided upon on short notice? You must have had some sort of thought going through your mind as you decided upon the name or as you typed it in and registered the account...

I'd theorize one possibility, you felt the name might be somewhat powerful in the thought of reaction.. You do know, well most do that the number is very negative or just means something bad or demonic. Did you feel somehow by having that name it would draw attention to you? Perhaps it was an after-thought of spontaneousness; still the name is prominently negative.

Given that and your negativities trashing the whole of a faith in an argument was a really easy responsive argumentive painting by me ( a character argument depiction).

You wrote what you wrote.. It was a load of crap, but I think of you as a person whom is not truly a hateful person, just slipped up a bit.

"[edit]: I'm sure Mother Teresa is wonderful, but this God guy's views on the handicapped aren't nearly as progressive. Lev. 21:16-23"

Nice edit guy, still all you do is focus on the negatives... Its how you justify an unreality that is not true of the common Christian or what is derived commonly. Even in the uncommon it is uncommon that a true Christian would do anything wrong to a disabled person other then believe in healing them.

I know of no Christian in my experience who treats the disabled as you have insinuated.. Nearly as bad as EMP. Why are you so hateful that you cannot even be fair?

You argue against Christianity as a whole initially in your hate writing, attempt to justify it with biblical reasoning like emp and you cannot even be realistic with the reality of how the church or even the individual alone helps the disabled.

Here is a scenario, EMP does not care if Satanism is trashed, he has one goal just to trash Christians as he has proven, and you appear to be doing the same and strategically put down Satanism. Still as he did you attack Christianity then excuse your initial comments of pure propaganda with more ways of spreading the seemingly unjustified hatred and anti-Christian propaganda.

By chance are you talking to EMP in chat or PM? I'd not think so, but you two have much in common. It's called hate, that's what your doing so enough with it.

Christians do not mistreat the disabled, they help. You have argued most of the dividing points such as homosexuality, women, and hate of others faiths. Then you stoop to the ultimate low, somehow the disabled are victims of Christianity.

Your obvious..

As I said your obvious.

Also your not qualified to interpret the verses as I have not looked them up, only a Christian is.

Your anti-christian.. All you have done is attacked, your a hater..

Indeed, I know christians won't agree nor are the truth of them compared to the trash you have spoken. I've known to many..

I know your wrong, I just think your a hater and desire to defile what is good becuase of your jelious ego of him.