Page 2 of 2 [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Awiddershinlife
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 403
Location: On the Continental Divide in the Gila Wilderness

25 Jul 2009, 2:24 pm

lau wrote:
The article was very, very intelligent.

A pity so many people (including me) failed to read it.


I read it but missed the point at first, so I gotta vote that, although factual, it was not intelligent (either that or I am the one lacking intelligence - any way there was a lack of intelligence between the article and this reader :roll: )

The author was trying to illuminate a pro-as point of view, but the article was so overburdoned with anti-as info and the author's point was not forceful enough to be clearly made, and thus was burried under the avalanch of negativity.

I wished that his thesis statement had been more clearly stated so idiots like me could grasp it on the first reading


_________________
~
We sour green apples live our own inscrutable, carefree lives... (Max Frei)
~


SilverPikmin
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 360
Location: Merseyside, England, UK

12 Aug 2009, 3:39 pm

I think some people might be missing the point of this article. It's from Language Log, a linguistics blog which I read occasionally. It's primarily about linguistics, not Asperger's. It's talking about how the meaning of words can shift (semantic drift), quite rapidly. The author says they think the way Asperger's is being used is quite insulting for us. The author isn't someone who would use Asperger's like this.

The problem is, once a word starts drifting like this, you can't really stop it. Linguists know this well. It happened with 'ret*d', 'spastic', and the N-word. Hopefully the fact that Asperger's Syndrome is a bit of a mouthful means it won't be completely mainstreamed like with 'ret*d'.



AnnePande
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 994
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

15 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm

We see people more as objects than as people?? Hmm... :roll:



Awiddershinlife
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 403
Location: On the Continental Divide in the Gila Wilderness

15 Aug 2009, 1:16 pm

AnnePande wrote:
We see people more as objects than as people?? Hmm... :roll:


...at least according to the out-side-looking-in view of the "experts"


_________________
~
We sour green apples live our own inscrutable, carefree lives... (Max Frei)
~