Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Right, so Confucianism through the Analects. The Bhagavad Gita for Hinduism. The Tao Te Ching for Taoism. And the Sutras are Buddhist, right?
Ok, so I am on the right track. I own the Bhagavad Gita(I need to re-read it so I can distinguish better between the interpreter's notes, and the actual text as I wasn't good at distinguishing the two in the first read though). I checked out the Tao Te Ching. I didn't get those Sutras for Buddhism, but I did check out a book by Paul Carus called " Buddhism and It's Christian Critics", and a book by Nagarjuna called Mūlamadhyamaka-kārikā or "The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way".
I would be surprised if you can't find the sutras on the web somewhere. Nagarjuna is probably a good place to start; he's counted as one of the founders of Mahayana buddhism, one of the main branches, but afaIk was still fairly faithful to the theravada roots. If you want to go back to the roots of buddhism, though, you should probably look for theravada sources.
Zen is a branch of mahayana buddhism. While it is still very buddhist - still talks of reincarnatioin, has a strong emphasis on meditation, etc - it has a unique flavor all its own and you might look it up just for that.
Quote:
I dismissed Confucius, but I am rethinking that matter a bit. My big concern is that Confucius seems more like a straight-up conservative than an evolutionary conservative, and I don't value the latter, but I do value the former somewhat.
Confucius sort of grows on you. I started out leaning towards liking taoism and dismissing confucianism as just another agent of social control, but I ended up thinking the opposite. Confucius, essentially, describes what it is to be civilized and live a beautiful life. I'd definitely recommend the analects vs. some of the latter students of confucianism that re-interpreted things to fit their own cultural ideas. Again, you can probably find at least the best known of the analects online, if not the full accounting.
Another important read is
The Art of War by Sun Tzu. It
is about war, but it's not a stretch at all to apply it to philosophy - sort of on a level with Machiavelli's
The Prince.