Callista wrote:
So why are they researching this for autism, then?
IMO it's just other ghost created by the "lack of empathy" impression that was taken to be more than an impression but rather an explanation.
...Because since autistics lack empathy, they are obviously are incapable of bonding to humans or animals or anything else, and are presumably low in oxytocin.
Anyone who loves their pets, stuffed animals, or even people, has oxytocin functioning fine in their brains, and there seem to be plenty of autistics who do those things. It's all the "lack of empathy," "lack of emotion" appearances yet again. It's even arguable that there is excess oxytocinergic action going on -- bonding "too much" to animals, or inanimate objects. (Or more likely there's something entirely else going on.)
aRGh. Color me skeptical and unimpressed.
Insightful comments about that study by Michelle Dawson, autistic researcher, here:
http://autismcrisis.blogspot.com/2010/0 ... e-for.htmlQuote:
And indeed, the treatment was successful. Autistics randomly administered a nasal mist containing oxytocin, rather than a saline placebo, significantly improved. They became willing to work with one of the players in an effort to shun and discriminate against the other two, and thereby get more than their fair share of money and attention. They became willing to see the player who shared with them as good and trustworthy, and the player who shared with someone else as bad and untrustworthy. They learned and displayed selfishness and hypocrisy and us-vs-them thinking. Their objectivity, fairness, and altruism were--temporarily--cured.