Avarice wrote:
I'm also an active member, I doubt that there are even 4000 active, though it does depend on your definition of active, I tend to see a core group of people who post with a few others who chime in when they have something to say, and then those who post once or twice a month and so on.
Which is why we defined an active member as one who had at least 2 posts to their credit; we could further refine the numbers to your own specifications using the process I outlined in the other thread, so you can reach your own projections. I agree that people get involved to different levels, but to disregard them is imposing one limited definition for what is an active member... and I prefer to be more encompassing.
M.
_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.
For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.
So long, and thanks for all the fish!