ruveyn wrote:
DeaconBlues wrote:
All conspiracy theories founder on a single shoal: If a group of six friends can't agree on what to have for lunch, how are we to expect a large group of power-hungry control freaks to stick together on anything for any considerable amount of time?
And if two close friends can't keep each other's secrets for long, how long before any conspiracy is exposed?
ruveyn
I dunno if either of you read the article all the way through (I didn't manage it myself), but in case you didn't see, the author was not disputing the official story (at least not in terms of who did it), merely (merely!) trying to explain the significance of the time and the place. (Ok, I admit it wasn't an explanation I found very convincing at all.)
I personally do not dispute the official story behind 9/11 either, but I do kind of wonder how the official story (that 19 guys conspired together to commit a terrorist attack and managed to keep their plans a secret for however many months) is not a conspiracy theory itself.
DeaconBlues, I do not find your argument all that persuasive in itself. If a group of six friends can't agree on what to have for lunch, it's a wonder anything ever gets done anywhere.
Last edited by skysaw on 04 May 2010, 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.