walk-in-the-rain wrote:
It is a sensitive subject because it often turns into the blame game with some people saying it's the men (or women) who are at fault. Trying to educate people to protect themselves isn't the same as making excuses for domestic violence. It may help people be more pro-active and hopefully avoid these kinds of situations.
Yeah, but I mentioned educating people once and I got clobbered. I guess being pro-active is something that offends some people. The instant you mention anything to do with women protecting themselves, they think you're blaming them 100% for the things that happen to them. But we as a society can't just sit back and watch woman after woman get beat up by male partners (or even get killed) and just keep handing out prison sentences. It happens over and over, and the rate of violence is not going down at all. Some guys have gotten the message and they march alongside women in marches against such violence.
But, all we are doing as a society is blaming men, handing out prison sentences, and giving women zero tools to protect themselves, because it is apparently "sexist" to suggest that they have any responsibility whatsoever to protect themselves. Picking a guy to date that has a clear history of violence, including against other women, is a sure sign that the guy is trouble. I don't care if there's "chemistry".
We have become highly focused on helping women who are in abusive relationships to get out of the relationship (absolutely a vital thing), but we are doing absolutely nothing to prevent violence from happening in the first place. Telling men that it is not okay to abuse women can only go so far. Likewise telling people that it is not okay to rob a store at gunpoint can only go so far - it still happens. Solutions are developed to help combat the latter problem, including store security cameras, automatic locks on doors, bars on windows, and so forth. In the city I live in, gas station robberies have become a very rare occurence, because of the massive security measures implemented by gas station owners. (I have been told this by multiple gas station managers who I have contact with.)
But what do women do to protect themselves from another type of aggressor? Nothing. Choosing the guy with a history of violence (like Charlie in
But He Loves Me), particularly those with criminal records is not protecting oneself from violence.
There is no deterrance in place for men, and unless forced castration became legal, there will be no deterrance for certain men not to commit such acts. They are slaves to testosterone, and they express themselves through anger. I admit it; I'm a male.
So, what are we as a society going to do about this?