Page 11 of 12 [ 192 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

23 Aug 2010, 7:20 pm

greenblue wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
you have to hate me.


Interesting that disliking another culture is equivocated with "hating" another culture or a member from another culture.

The issue in this thread is not about different cultures, it is about 'race' and the difference related to that aspect rather than the culture people come from, Hanotaux claimed to be racialist.


Hanotaux can claim what he likes. However, there are cultures that I dislike, not races. NASCAR however is boring, but if they were to use rockets to increase their velocity past the sonic barrier, now that would be cool.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

23 Aug 2010, 7:30 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Hanotaux can claim what he likes. However, there are cultures that I dislike.

Then your previous comment has no relevance to this thread. I and most people here, would eventually dislike a different culture that have different values, which that is pretty much obvious to happen, but the connection to ethnic physical characteristics of its people and discrimation based on it, or even, discrimination solely because a person came from such a culture, is the actual problem.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

23 Aug 2010, 7:51 pm

greenblue wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Hanotaux can claim what he likes. However, there are cultures that I dislike.

Then your previous comment has no relevance to this thread. I and most people here, would eventually dislike a different culture that have different values, which that is pretty much obvious to happen, but the connection to ethnic physical characteristics of its people and discrimation based on it, or even, discrimination solely because a person came from such a culture, is the actual problem.


If I remember correctly, the opening post of this thread was some random quotation of Thomas Jefferson which included a reference to Muslims. In that case, the ethnic physical characteristics are not of the person's body necessarily, (I usually get mistaken for an Iranian fairly often, which is annoying to me, but I am Irish and French in my ancestry, not from Medai and Elam). Instead, other things are more indicative of the culture they belong to, some of which include physical, yet alterable, characteristics like manner of clipping nail, facial hair, women wearing burqas, how the men treat the women, etc.



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

23 Aug 2010, 7:57 pm

The word "hate" may not have been exactly right, but the strength of the term has little to do with the point I making.

On a side note, talking about "distinctive American culture developed in the 1800's and 1900's," I would suggest that a recent immigrant, from an article I recently read, may actually embody it better than any of us. If I remember all the details correctly, he is 75 years old, from the Philippines, and recently received his citizenship. Being selected, in fact, to lead the oath. When he finished his citizenship interview, and was told he would get his American citizenship, he was so excited he asked the agent if he play a few songs on his harmonica. She said yes, and he went through all the patriotic classics, to the delight of the whole office. He continues to work full time and draws no social security. Now THAT is American spirit.

Shame that those who would define being an American by skin color would assume they embody it better than he does.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

23 Aug 2010, 8:04 pm

DW_a_mom wrote:
He continues to work full time and draws no social security. Now THAT is American spirit.


Now THAT is somebody who is respectable for their work ethic, just like most illegal immigrants from Latin America are similarly respectable for their work ethic.



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

23 Aug 2010, 9:13 pm

I think it's time to stop debating on this topic. If there is something positive to post, go for it, but there isn't much point in continuing to go point and counter-point; it's just tearing at people at this point and I'm rather sorry to have inadvertently contributed to it.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


Last edited by DW_a_mom on 23 Aug 2010, 10:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

23 Aug 2010, 9:31 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
If I remember correctly, the opening post of this thread was some random quotation of Thomas Jefferson which included a reference to Muslims.

well, I mean the relevance to the issue at the moment related to the post you were replying to.

Quote:
In that case, the ethnic physical characteristics are not of the person's body necessarily, (I usually get mistaken for an Iranian fairly often, which is annoying to me, but I am Irish and French in my ancestry, not from Medai and Elam). Instead, other things are more indicative of the culture they belong to, some of which include physical, yet alterable, characteristics like manner of clipping nail, facial hair, women wearing burqas, how the men treat the women, etc.

Yeah, sometimes people confuse others in that aspect, such as hispanics with arabs, I think.
With that beard, you may look like a muslim :P


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

23 Aug 2010, 10:34 pm

codarac wrote:
In 1950s America the majority of people believed the races were different and accepted it as a fact of life, while racial egalitarians were on the “fringe”. In the 1950s America still practiced racial segregation, many states had anti-miscegenation laws, and the country’s immigration system was designed to maintain the USA as a predominantly White country. Now in modern day America the majority of people profess to believe in racial equality (although the phenomenon of White Flight suggests many do not practice what they preach).

So – and I’d like to open up this question to everybody - what has caused this change in attitude?

Perhaps brave Galileo-like psychologists (those ‘soft’ scientists) made discoveries in the 60s and 70s (with their multi-choice question sheets and primitive EEG skullcaps) that so conclusively proved the racial egalitarians right that the political and media elites (who, despite typically being graduates in business or law, actually hang onto cognitive scientists’ every word) and the great unwashed (who are themselves all keen followers of research science literature, of course) all experienced damascene conversions, leaving only a few gap-toothed, inbred hicks unable to see the light? Or is it perhaps more likely that it is simply the nature and aims of the power elites that have changed, and that they have manufactured consent among the masses accordingly? In other words: is this general change in racial attitudes over a matter of decades chiefly down to science, or is it chiefly down to politics and power?

If it is down to science, then I’d really like to see the clincher. I mean, since different races mean different gene pools, and genotype influences phenotype, and the races are so obviously different in appearance (and even in susceptibility to various diseases), then Occam’s Razor would suggest that genetic differences would also contribute to behavioural differences (which might help explain some of the things that are routinely put down to colonialism, slavery, racism, "culture" and pretty much anything else). So where is this great scientific discovery that conclusively demonstrates that the races differ in terms of genes that code only for physical appearance and for nothing else?

PS – Orwell, people over the age of 13 really should not be saying things like “meh”.

I'd actually have to say "paradigm shift". The issue isn't literal equality, but rather practical treatment. Our treatment of different races didn't follow from inequality, but rather a dehumanization of one race compared to another. What has happened isn't a matter of science or politics and power, but rather of persuasion and integration. At some point, people generally accepted that race isn't fundamental to how human an individual is, and this was partially supported with politics, power, but also by the fact that relevant facts were such that they could be easily assessed. While some people may like blacks less, the big issue is that most people recognize different races as equally human, rather than attempting some "scale of humanity" for races.

I mean, the only argument I can see that if true has much validity for the matter is to argue that races are more unifying than cultures, but the issue is that skepticism towards this seems somewhat justifiable, particularly given how much "race" has even shifted over time, given that even the Irish used to be considered subhuman, and have now ditched that title. (not due to science or power and politics much either in all likelihood)

As for meh, meh is a fine thing to write or say. I hardly see why Orwell should take your advice on the matter, and really it seems rather ridiculous.



Hanotaux
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 355

23 Aug 2010, 11:37 pm

Quote:
At some point, people generally accepted that race isn't fundamental to how human an individual is


I think you may be right TBH. Mabye I just need to give some people another chance. It still doesn't mean I embrace the whole spectrum of "change," but I feel many of the reasons I feel how I feel are based on deep-rooted things that will never be wiped away. I don't think I'll truly internalize any different values but I think I took it too far going at it on a forum like this over the last few days.

As far as the "anecdotal evidence" goes though, yes, minority youths often form gangs in schools. In my school, they called it Lil' Mob or something like that.

If I continued to describe or even point out facts about black crime or crappy inner-city schools, etc, or just talk about it, I'd likely just keep getting jumped on though.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

23 Aug 2010, 11:45 pm

Hanotaux wrote:
Quote:
At some point, people generally accepted that race isn't fundamental to how human an individual is


I think you may be right TBH. Mabye I just need to give some people another chance. It still doesn't mean I embrace the whole spectrum of "change," but I feel many of the reasons I feel how I feel are based on deep-rooted things that will never be wiped away. I don't think I'll truly internalize any different values but I think I took it too far going at it on a forum like this over the last few days.

As far as the "anecdotal evidence" goes though, yes, minority youths often form gangs in schools. In my school, they called it Lil' Mob or something like that.

Often isn't the same as "always". The issue is that unless we can commit ourselves to something more substantive than overlapping statistical variations with greater or lower averages. Particularly this is relevant given that socioeconomic issues tend to be very relevant in these cases. I mean, yes, these people will sometimes engage in these behaviors, but many people still have examples of coworkers and friends and so on, who really aren't so problematic. Even further, as I brought up earlier, racisms sometimes completely die off, such as that towards the Irish, even though likely many similar criticisms could have been made towards that group as are being made towards current groups.



Hanotaux
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 355

24 Aug 2010, 12:18 am

^ Fine.................. I feel differently about all of this though

I feel no need to restate anything.......... I already explained how I felt that since the Irish, English, Germans, etc, were all white people(s), that would make eventual integration more natural than that between whites and incoming non-whites. I hope it doesn't happen anyway to preserve the uniqueness of both whites and various non-white cultures. I'd rather see everyone's culture preserved than just one beige mass with the same pop-culture. I see nothing natural or desireable about diversity or the projected outcome of a multicultural/brown-uniracial society.

I'm glad though, honestly, that all of you with a couple exceptions are apparently happy and well-adjusted to diversity and have had positive experiences with multiculturalism. I'm glad for you that you are able to embrace your fates for better or worse.

Diversity was the dominant culture I was raised in. Having AS, I feel that my natural instinct was to revolt against that diverse instant-gratification culture. I saw diversity as superficial, destructive, and violent, and many other negative superlatives.

It seems though that many of you are in some sort of reaction against what you perceive as "the white conservative racist establishment." Honestly, I see diversity, multiculturalism, the liberal media and schools, as being the catalyst for conformity in the country, and those that resist these pressures as the ones fighting for their independence. I can see where you are coming from about resisting right-wingers as well though. I think there is a truth and legitimacy to both sides TBH. It seems sometimes like a few leftists on this forum can be insulting and overbearing in how they present their arguements, and demand acceptance of their ethos from those that disagree.................It seems like dissenters are just ovewhelmed with massive point-counterpoint block-quote posts based on lots of superficial fine-print differences until the whole debate just becomes an infinite back-and-forth kind of thing with no real meaning anymore.......... I suppose if you grew up in a predominately white suburb and went to a majority white school with AS, you may well feel disenchanted with that establishment and seek your own self-expression. More power to you if this is your case.

My revolt, however, was to be white and retain my white Euro-centric identity as what I perceived as the minority influences bombarding me everywhere.

All of the "cool white kids" I ever knew growing up(the ones who were commonly accepted as cool by the consensus,) completely embraced the MTV rapper culture and all of that. So that was my revolt against both them and the minority students who I perceived as getting privileged status.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

24 Aug 2010, 4:53 am

Hanotaux wrote:
^ Fine.................. I feel differently about all of this though

I feel no need to restate anything.......... I already explained how I felt that since the Irish, English, Germans, etc, were all white people(s), that would make eventual integration more natural than that between whites and incoming non-whites. I hope it doesn't happen anyway to preserve the uniqueness of both whites and various non-white cultures. I'd rather see everyone's culture preserved than just one beige mass with the same pop-culture. I see nothing natural or desireable about diversity or the projected outcome of a multicultural/brown-uniracial society.

I'm glad though, honestly, that all of you with a couple exceptions are apparently happy and well-adjusted to diversity and have had positive experiences with multiculturalism. I'm glad for you that you are able to embrace your fates for better or worse.

Diversity was the dominant culture I was raised in. Having AS, I feel that my natural instinct was to revolt against that diverse instant-gratification culture. I saw diversity as superficial, destructive, and violent, and many other negative superlatives.

It seems though that many of you are in some sort of reaction against what you perceive as "the white conservative racist establishment." Honestly, I see diversity, multiculturalism, the liberal media and schools, as being the catalyst for conformity in the country, and those that resist these pressures as the ones fighting for their independence. I can see where you are coming from about resisting right-wingers as well though. I think there is a truth and legitimacy to both sides TBH. It seems sometimes like a few leftists on this forum can be insulting and overbearing in how they present their arguements, and demand acceptance of their ethos from those that disagree.................It seems like dissenters are just ovewhelmed with massive point-counterpoint block-quote posts based on lots of superficial fine-print differences until the whole debate just becomes an infinite back-and-forth kind of thing with no real meaning anymore.......... I suppose if you grew up in a predominately white suburb and went to a majority white school with AS, you may well feel disenchanted with that establishment and seek your own self-expression. More power to you if this is your case.

My revolt, however, was to be white and retain my white Euro-centric identity as what I perceived as the minority influences bombarding me everywhere.

All of the "cool white kids" I ever knew growing up(the ones who were commonly accepted as cool by the consensus,) completely embraced the MTV rapper culture and all of that. So that was my revolt against both them and the minority students who I perceived as getting privileged status.


I think we are starting to speak different languages.

Diversity, to me, does not mean homogeneity--precisely the opposite. I, as a white person of British heritage do not start to adopt the culture of the Punjabi family that lives next door. Rather, diversity suggests that we are a stronger, more vibrant community when I am in a position to live in the context of my culture and they are free to do the same.

Canada has, for the last 40 years or so, rejected the model of the "melting pot" in favour of a policy of multiculturalism. The former implies various cultures getting subsumed by one, overarching culture, that is an amalgam of them all (rather like your "beige mass." But multiculturalism is about maintaining cultural distinctiveness.

So, the question I put is, "Should immigrants shed their cultural and religious identity at the customs hall, and adopt the "beige mass" as their cultural identity, or should they retain their distinctiveness within American society?"


_________________
--James


BigK
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 400

24 Aug 2010, 5:43 am

DW_a_mom wrote:
I think it's time to stop debating on this topic. If there is something positive to post, go for it, but there isn't much point in continuing to go point and counter-point; it's just tearing at people at this point and I'm rather sorry to have inadvertently contributed to it.


Most of the boards I visit have a simple rule that makes life a lot easier for the Mods. "No politics, no religion". ;)

If there is going to be a PPR board at all there is no point pulling the plug when ever anything interesting comes up.

The endless round of Christian, Muslim, Atheist baiting get's a little dull after a while. ;)


_________________
"It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out of your door," he used to say. "You step into the Road, and if you don't keep your feet, there is no knowing where you might be swept off to.

"How can it not know what it is?"


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

24 Aug 2010, 11:23 am

BigK wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
I think it's time to stop debating on this topic. If there is something positive to post, go for it, but there isn't much point in continuing to go point and counter-point; it's just tearing at people at this point and I'm rather sorry to have inadvertently contributed to it.


Most of the boards I visit have a simple rule that makes life a lot easier for the Mods. "No politics, no religion". ;)

If there is going to be a PPR board at all there is no point pulling the plug when ever anything interesting comes up.

The endless round of Christian, Muslim, Atheist baiting get's a little dull after a while. ;)


After 11 pages it seemed like there really weren't any new arguments to make, and the attacks were pretty repetitive, and I knew people were getting upset. So, that was my effort to calm it down. Got to try, right? Particularly since I think my ill-timed modding effort was part of the problem.

The last few posts are much more productive and less hurtful. I'm not going to claim that is because people decided to listen to me; I think what I posted was more a statement of fact on where the evolution of the thread was.

I really, really do NOT want new parties to jump in right now, read old discussion, and revive attack. I posted mostly as a way for people to SEE quickly that things had gone past that point, so they might avoid the temptation. (bolded for the scanning public; this is not really a statement made to you)

But I am curious, since you are aware of this thread - what do you feel about it? Not about anyone or any post in particular, but the overall discussion and variety of positions?


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


BigK
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 400

24 Aug 2010, 1:56 pm

DW_a_mom wrote:
But I am curious, since you are aware of this thread - what do you feel about it? Not about anyone or any post in particular, but the overall discussion and variety of positions?


I have been angered and saddened by the thread.

But then a bit of anger and sadness is a small price to pay to hear honest opinions honestly put.
(Especially by people who may not wish to go anywhere near me in real life.) ;)

I'd let it go as long as people are not abusing each other (too much ;) ).


_________________
"It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out of your door," he used to say. "You step into the Road, and if you don't keep your feet, there is no knowing where you might be swept off to.

"How can it not know what it is?"


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

24 Aug 2010, 3:22 pm

BigK wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
But I am curious, since you are aware of this thread - what do you feel about it? Not about anyone or any post in particular, but the overall discussion and variety of positions?


I have been angered and saddened by the thread.


Thanks for being willing to tell us that. I am sorry.

Quote:
But then a bit of anger and sadness is a small price to pay to hear honest opinions honestly put.
(Especially by people who may not wish to go anywhere near me in real life.) ;)

I'd let it go as long as people are not abusing each other (too much ;) ).


And thanks for being gracious about it all.

Life is full of unhappy truths. We aren't a utopia, and I'm not convinced human nature will ever let us be one.

I remember hearing about a lecturer (who is black, btw) who does diversity training for corporations. In his training, he says the first step is for everyone (white, black, purple, whatever) to admit they are racist. In some way or another. As in, even if a person believes in equality and act towards it, can they really say that there is no part of themselves that instinctively gravitates towards people that look the same or have the same background as they do? Most people do; but there are different degrees to it, and different ideas about advocating or fighting it. His point was, you can't rise above what you won't admit exists. So, he asks everyone to admit it. Then he asks them what they are doing to DO about it. Not as a big gesture, but in their own lives, with the little things. Where you shop, how you associate with people, and all that.

I like to believe that most of us do try to do something about it, but I don't know how far the average person actually gets.

Anyway. Thank you.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).