I have never understood the appeal of Kubrick's "The Shining" I certainly like a lot of his films, "A Clockwork Orange" "2001" "Dr. Strangelove" etc, but I don't get the Shining.
I even watched it with the expectation that it couldn't be as bad as my mother kept insisting, but actually it was. The film is stupidly made. I can't comment on whether it is a faithful adaption of the book. I haven't read it so I can only judge it on its merits as a film.
I think casting Jack Nicholson was a very poor choice. He normally plays kind of crazy anyway and I think the character would have worked better if an actor who normally seems well balanced ends up going completely nuts. Look at Jimmy Stewart's performance in "Vertigo" That was a creepy performance. I also found the cut back to Scatman Crothers that begins with a tight close up of some tacky nude woman poster to be rather offensive. What story telling purpose did that serve? It seemed more like Kubrick was thinking "Golly, it worked really well in Clockwork Orange, I think I'll do it again!"
I will admit there are some really great visuals in the film. The dead twin sisters and the blood pouring out of the doors are very evocative images. But the over the top acting with little connection to realistic human behavior makes the film seem like an experiment in style over substance.
_________________
Never let the weeds get higher than the garden,
Always keep a sapphire in your mind.
(Tom Waits "Get Behind the Mule")