5 Most Underrated Film Sequels of All-Time
Alien 3 - Though it's not in the same league as it's epic and legendary predecessors, the director's cut of Alien 3 is partially underrated due to the gothic music, the murky setting of an all-male prison planet and Ripley going bald. Originally, the plan was the infamous wooden planet concept, but Vincent Ward and the studio clashed constantly.
Just imagine what would of been......
_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty
Alien 3 to me was a return to the franchises roots after Aliens(Great movie mind you) went the balls to the wall action route as opposed to the sci-fi horror pacing of the original with one alien picking off a bunch of people not armed to deal with something so deadly. Why so many people hate it, I happen to think it was fantastic and its a tough call for me which of the first 3 I like the most.
Alien Resurrection on the other hand, yeah, that movie sucked.
Quantum of Solace is another film I see get a lot of hate and I thought was excellent. I actually think I liked it better than Skyfall though not as good as Casino Royale. So far Daniel Craig has fallen into the same pattern Pierce Brosnan did with each movie getting worse, but nowhere near as drastically and all three of Craig's would be ranked among the better half of Bond of films while the last two Brosnan films, particularly Die Another Day are among the worst. The ending to Skyfall however was excellent and bodes well for the future of the franchise but I think Quantum of Solace was more consistent in quality throughout the entire film.
Alien Resurrection on the other hand, yeah, that movie sucked.
Quantum of Solace is another film I see get a lot of hate and I thought was excellent. I actually think I liked it better than Skyfall though not as good as Casino Royale. So far Daniel Craig has fallen into the same pattern Pierce Brosnan did with each movie getting worse, but nowhere near as drastically and all three of Craig's would be ranked among the better half of Bond of films while the last two Brosnan films, particularly Die Another Day are among the worst. The ending to Skyfall however was excellent and bodes well for the future of the franchise but I think Quantum of Solace was more consistent in quality throughout the entire film.
QOS's ending was so brilliantly done, the way Bond tells M that she was right about Vesper before he drops her necklace in the snow and leaves still gives me chills.
_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty
AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 70,190
Location: Portland, Oregon
Though QOS was filmed during the Writers Strike, I read an article around when QOS was released on DVD/Blu-Ray that director Marc Forster intentionally half-assed QOS because the studio wouldn't let him exercise creative control. Yes, QOS was cheesy & rushed, but it was a good movie to watch.
_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!
They way the Gungans talk way be annoying, but it's less annoying than the vocalizations of the ewoks, or worse yet, the wookies. *shudder*
I never understood why people thought Jar Jar was annoying but not Chewbocca. As annoying as Jar Jar may have been, he did have the only good line of dialogue in episode 1. All Chebocca ever did was screech.
And at least the Gungans had a cool battle scene, even if the "plot's" attempt to explain that fight made no sense.
X-Men: The Last Stand. A lot of people didn't really like this, but I loved it because the plotline about curing the mutants really resonated with me. Of course, I should give full disclosure that I've never seen the previous installments in full and am not all that familiar with X-Men in general.
I'd have to agree with previous comments about Home Alone 2 as well. And Ace Ventura 2: When Nature Calls seems to generally not be as well liked as the original, but I actually thought it was funnier.
I put each movie's Rotten Tomatoes rating after the title.
The Crow: City of Angels (1996) - 12%
I actually liked this movie more than the first one. It's at least more interesting visually, and with all due respect to Brandon Lee, Vincent Perez is a better actor.
Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 (2000) - 13%
This movie is no masterpiece, but it's a lot smarter than the braindead original. It's actually about something -- the unreliability of myth and storytelling versus the truth that's captured on camera -- whereas the first movie is about nothing much at all.
Hannibal (2001) - 39%
People expected Silence of the Lambs II, and they predictably revolted. Too bad, because Hannibal is a fine thriller, certainly better than the paint-by-numbers Red Dragon.
Predator 2 (1990) - 25%
It's not quite as good as the original, but it's closer than you'd think based on the chilly reception it got. I really have a hard time understanding how someone could like the first movie but not the second.
Rambo (2008) - 37%
This fourth installment is about as good as the first, and maybe better. So why the lack of enthusiasm?
Also worthy of mention:
Alien Resurrection (1997) - 52%
People talk about this very good movie like it's an embarrassment to the series or something. Perhaps they're mistaking it for Alien 3.
Blade: Trinity (2004) - 26%
Is it the worst film in the trilogy? Yes. Is is significantly worse than the previous two films? No. As with Predator 2, if you enjoyed what came before, I can't imagine you not liking it.
Alien Resurrection (1997) - 52%
People talk about this very good movie like it's an embarrassment to the series or something. Perhaps they're mistaking it for Alien 3.
You clearly got those two backwards. Alien 3 is fantastic. Calling Resurrection a very good movie is laughable. Its mildly entertaining at best but I would never call it good.
Just go watch this if you need to be sold on why Alien 3 is awesome.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/ ... 78-Alien-3
KyleTheGhost
Veteran
Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 70,217
Location: Luna, Imagination Isle
I thought it was better than they say as well. I enjoyed the parts with Magento.
Another one: Spider-Man 3.
I enjoyed the final battles from both.
_________________
I am Ashley. My pronouns are female.
The Crow: City of Angels (1996) - 12%
I actually liked this movie more than the first one. It's at least more interesting visually, and with all due respect to Brandon Lee, Vincent Perez is a better actor.
Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 (2000) - 13%
This movie is no masterpiece, but it's a lot smarter than the braindead original. It's actually about something -- the unreliability of myth and storytelling versus the truth that's captured on camera -- whereas the first movie is about nothing much at all.
Hannibal (2001) - 39%
People expected Silence of the Lambs II, and they predictably revolted. Too bad, because Hannibal is a fine thriller, certainly better than the paint-by-numbers Red Dragon.
Predator 2 (1990) - 25%
It's not quite as good as the original, but it's closer than you'd think based on the chilly reception it got. I really have a hard time understanding how someone could like the first movie but not the second.
Rambo (2008) - 37%
This fourth installment is about as good as the first, and maybe better. So why the lack of enthusiasm?
Also worthy of mention:
Alien Resurrection (1997) - 52%
People talk about this very good movie like it's an embarrassment to the series or something. Perhaps they're mistaking it for Alien 3.
Blade: Trinity (2004) - 26%
Is it the worst film in the trilogy? Yes. Is is significantly worse than the previous two films? No. As with Predator 2, if you enjoyed what came before, I can't imagine you not liking it.
Hannibal is definitely better than Red Dragon, but Alien 3 is more enjoyable than Resurrection.
_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty
I thought this one was underrated as well, because I thought I remembered critics not liking it.
But I looked it up, and to my surprise...
The Addams Family - 60% on Rotten Tomatoes
Addams Family Values - 78% on Rotten Tomatoes
Of course, 78% is still too low. Every movie starring Raul Julia deserves 100%.
Yes, even Street Fighter.
Especially Street Fighter.
I thought this one was underrated as well, because I thought I remembered critics not liking it.
But I looked it up, and to my surprise...
The Addams Family - 60% on Rotten Tomatoes
Addams Family Values - 78% on Rotten Tomatoes
Of course, 78% is still too low. Every movie starring Raul Julia deserves 100%.
Yes, even Street Fighter.
Especially Street Fighter.
I was under the impression that it wasn't liked by critics too, but I've never checked out Rotten Tomatoes. I've always used IMDB for reviews on movies.
Dredd - Better in every department than the Stallone pile of rubbish. No annoying comedy, Karl Urban snarling, Olivia Thirlby kicking arse and grimy and grungy ultra violence.
_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Rewriting a song as a film |
16 Mar 2024, 4:08 pm |
Scientists Create a Diamond Film in Just 150 Minutes |
24 Apr 2024, 7:40 pm |
It's that time again |
09 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm |
Do you think it will ever be possible to go back in time? |
20 Apr 2024, 7:33 pm |