91 wrote:
^^^^
That's an interesting response to an attempt at reaching middle ground. Considering you seem to attack, literally, everything I am posting recently, I can only interpret this statement within your wider pattern of belligerence. Your actions have now crossed into the realm of the absurd.
Well... the thing is that usually when a person is thinking of "non-interventionist" they aren't thinking of highly specific changes in the tax structure, but rather they are thinking about broader issues, like "I think corporate taxes should be reduced", "I think the tax code should be flatter", "I advocate reduced spending", "I advocate deregulating a number of industries", "I advocate privatizing a number of industries". The changes you advocate tell me almost nothing about how you are politically non-interventionist because anybody can advocate highly specific changes like that, especially given that the net result is going to be almost neutral on tax revenue.
That being said, read me however you want, because that's what you are going to do anyway.