dionysian wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Yeah... that would only apply if you actually provide facts or evidence, which you never do.
The mere fact that I am saying something should qualify as evidence.
It's evidence that you hold the opinion but that's all. Just saying something only tells people how you feel or think about a subject. But it doesn't give any facts they can use to make their own decisions on how to feel or think about it (for those who haven't yet formed a firm opinion).
There are some subjects about which I already have an entrenched opinion before I come to this board. Nothing anybody says is likely to sway me (per the linked article). The only thing that would sway me would be a life-changing experience of my own (per my own earlier post).
But when the subject is something that I don't already have an opinion on (e.g. the politics of a country other than my own), then I choose my opinion based on what other people post. And how they frame their arguments when I
haven't made up my mind is what sways me. If I'm not yet committed to a particular viewpoint (sometimes because it isn't emotionally a part of my life) then clear, logical arhuments work for me. Links that verify what the person is arguing are good too. They show that the person didn't just make up what they are saying. That's evidence.
But, "because I said so" isn't evidence. And it isn't a very compelling argument.