Humans are pack animals? How much?

Post Reply New Topic

If not for certain developed parts of the brain, we'd be full blown pack mentality, with an alpha male, an alpha female, and progressively lower ranks, until you reached the guy everyone craps on. We wouldn't follow the gray wolf model, but probably some higher primate.

It's kinda intimidating and sad to think about it, but when I look at people in social groups, I can almost see who's the highest ranking, and the people who barely have rank at all. It's almost always the most shallow, bull headed person who gets all the influence and status.

Then people should rebel against it all by being their own individual. *Smiles of encouragement*
In my opinion, when people fill their minds with this kind of thinking, it can consume and create circles of illusionary lack of self esteem with this illusionary thinking that we must be pack animals - not so. Humans have choice... we can choose what we do.
I would not consider myself a person with a pack mentality, and sometimes I can be a happy person.

Be who YOU want to be... ALL of you. NOT what some gang of people who have no connections or ties to you want you to be... sorry if this is a little expressive I just want to help and make my point from thoughts that have gotten to me, and I do not want these thoughts to get to other people.

Great days all. x

Yeah sad but true. But on the bright side in the modern age 'Knowledge is Power' and being smart is one thing we Aspies do well.

Which means even if I were not the way I am i probably would have still isolated myself.
As a kid I saw the group social dynamic and I wanted no parts of it.
And I do know it may be part of the 'animal' part in us, but seems that with intelligence it is not necessary.
Look at our governments and businesses.
We have people at the top with just as many flaws as people on the bottom.
Difference is a mistake at the top can hurt billions.

I can't imagine being one of the inferior lowest rank people or one of the top of the ladder, so if someone tries to dominate me in a group, I give them hell for it.
Alternatively, as an experienced alpha online, I attract a ton of boot lickers who do nothing but imitate me poorly and say I'm their hero and that they love me.

I'm an equalist individualist, probably because of the aspergers.

I hate social status rankings. Can't I just be me and you be you? I feel absolutely no need to dominate and will not allow myself to be dominated. That being said, I think it's a fact that humans are a social animal and therefore have a system of social rankings that come natural to us. I can't remember the name of the individual that came up with this idea, nor name of the description or even all the ranks but the system I thought most sensible went something like this.

At the top the alpha who is a leader and actually tries to do well for those below him, as this rank is nearly universally a him. Second a beat that is a bully and has power only by supporting the alpha. Then on down through other ranking that had particular little details like being interested in defusing conflicts or putting down the weaker while currying favor from the higher ranks until finally the lowest two ranks which were the guy, nearly always a guy, that everyone picks on but is in the group and the outcast that is driven away and tortured by all. Long sentence. Anyway, supposedly these ranks appear in any sufficiently large group, I think the critical number was around 50-60 for all ranks to appear and the really interesting part was that if you took all the individuals of one rank, alpha, beta, whatever, from a number of groups and made them interact long enough then some of the individuals will change to take on the positions that are vacant. Example, 100 alphas put in a group 1 stays an alpha, 1 becomes a beta and so on until one is an outcast even though they were an alpha in their original group. Anyone ever hear of this? I'd love to re-read this theory as it was about 20-25 years ago I read it the first time.

By pack animals, I thought the OP meant animals like mules and camels that carry stuff.