SteelMaiden wrote:
Last night I got through half a medium-sized mathematics textbook in two hours.
You're reminding me of myself at your age. If I had the chance, I'd go back and batter my earlier self around the head a lot to get him to lighten up.
As for intelligence, how about this: once upon a time I was pretty good at maths (though I very strongly dislike it) but nowadays my skills have largely atrophied. Am I any less
naturally clever now I can no longer do degree-level maths*? Was I any less
naturally clever before I learned to do so? I don't think so. Could I pick up maths to that level again if I was beaten with sticks? Sure; my point being that to some extent skill at maths and similar exercises - IQ tests, for instance - is a learned skill. Provided you have an aptitude for maths, you can learn to be good at it - or excellent at it, or whatever. Your native aptitude still makes a difference, but you
can't simply look at someone who is very good at maths - or, of course, IQ tests - and conclude that they're a naturally very clever person, because it's a function both of intelligence and learned skill.
Or another: at work today a colleague showed me some sample 11+ questions off the BBC website (maths and pseudo maths, much like an IQ test); he took the test and would've failed it. I took it and
of course aced it - I'd've been highly embarrassed if I didn't! - but of the half dozen people I watched take that test most failed and no-one else got it fully right (including a maths teacher ^^). Are my colleagues stupid, not to be able to pass a test for primary school children? Of course not. Those questions say more about the background and mindset of the test administrators than they do about the people taking it; they were questions set with a heavy assumption about the learned skills people have and while they
superficially measure intelligence what they really measure is whether one is familiar with that sort of pointless BS question.
Whatever real intelligence is, it ain't that.
I often feel both intelligent and stupid. I'm slow in some ways (and regardless of the above, I
don't have a high IQ, 'cause there's some aspects of those things I do badly at) but I do have some funky correlating s**t going on in my head enough to make me a proper clever dick. I've no trouble knowing and feeling myself to be clever, but equally well I know that cleverness does not truly lie in test scores and exam results. On the one hand I want to scream "yes, you're good at physics, it's the only real subject and nothing else is important!" but on the other I know that's a load of bollocks.
Hehe. Someone needs to work on their swear filter. Bollocks bollocks BOLLOCKS! Whu- simple things? I'll get me coat.
*well, okay, my degree is in physics. A bit more practical and less abstruse arty s**t than a straight maths degree would involve, but y'get what I'm saying.
_________________
No one has gone missing or died.
The year is still young.