Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

interesting theory,

Page 2 of 3 [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

One-Winged-Angel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,860
Location: Under your bed, in your closet, in your head

08 Oct 2006, 8:03 am

Quatermass wrote:
snake321 wrote:
They say the universe is forever expanding, our world is less than a grain of sand to the earth in the universe. Is it possible that every atom is in itself a smaller universe, and equally we're an atom on some larger being or thing? That it goes infinately in both directions, this is my theory. Also, it could only make since that there would be life on other worlds, or in other universes. I doubt we're (earthlings) the only life that exists, is it also possible that somewhere maybe a perfect world exists? I find these all to be interesting questions that perhaps we'll never have an answer to.


.........

You read one of the "Dark Tower" books, didn't you?


DARK TOWER!! !! !!

I LOVE STEPHEN KING'S BOOKS!! !

I WILL KILL THE CRIMSON KING AND TAKE OVER THE TOWER MYSELF! :twisted:


_________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.


Litigious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,505
Location: Nearest Wells Fargo trade

08 Oct 2006, 8:51 am

King was much better back in the old days. It's too much details and crap in his newer books. I think he crossed the line somewhere after It or Tommyknockers.


_________________
Let come what will, I'll try it on,
My condition can't be worse;
And if there's money in that box,
'Tis munny in my purse.


One-Winged-Angel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,860
Location: Under your bed, in your closet, in your head

08 Oct 2006, 9:51 am

Litigious wrote:
King was much better back in the old days. It's too much details and crap in his newer books. I think he crossed the line somewhere after It or Tommyknockers.


WHO CARES, HE STILL WRITES GOOD BOOKS.

YOU'RE JUST A N00B!


_________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.


Scintillate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2006
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,284
Location: Perth

10 Oct 2006, 5:01 am

I would apply occams razor is this scenario though, sure there is probably life in other parts of the universe, but we could research ourselves or ANY THING PRESENT in the universe and find laws relative to it anywhere else we go..

Sure like love, like light, earth is a spark in an ocean of darkness, but of course there are others, we don't need to prove it, it proves itself. For it wouldn't shine or work the way it does without the space around it..

I think applying some of einsteins little laws with logic and some modern discoveries can definately give us a theory of the universe, for what it is within us, is within all matter, what is in anti-matter is just the other side, effectively we could work out our universe, from the multitudes of information we can find in a single thing.