Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 

rombomb2
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 197

10 Dec 2011, 11:47 am

alone..
free..
but alone.

people see me..
but they don't hear me
is this new?
i wish i knew.
why question it?
of course not

why question?
there's a time and a place
philosophy..
the heart
...

i'm slower now.
maybe the validation..
maybe this writing..
..
metathought..
frozen in time
...

was i in a trance?
what was in there?
where is it now?

why don't i know..

who knows these things..

maybe me.
the future me
yes

can i talk to him?
what would he say?
ask mel, she knows how to ask him
but how does she?

she says.. listen

my dream
what does it mean?
why him? why that?
its not real
or is it?

its been there the whole time
trying to talk to me
but i wasn't listening
..
but no more
..

what can explain it?
i'll try..
a plane flies over head
why.. how..
first one, then two... then more
overwhelming..
can't think..

alone again..
tranquil
free
..

then a flash, so bright so fast
lighting up the room
spreading smiles across
..
then more flashes more brightness
pure bliss pure excitement
spreading..

spreading..

no
...
too fast... too fast

alone again... must find peace
..

maybe it was a trance?
how long did it last?
when did it start?
oh
..

..
now what?



Last edited by rombomb2 on 15 Dec 2011, 3:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

ForsakenEagle
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 466
Location: Alabama

11 Dec 2011, 4:43 am

I would comment, but I have no idea who this is.

Who is this?



rombomb2
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 197

11 Dec 2011, 8:09 am

ForsakenEagle wrote:
I would comment, but I have no idea who this is.

Who is this?


Its me. http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt183006.html



rombomb2
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 197

13 Dec 2011, 8:18 pm

ForsakenEagle wrote:
I would comment, but I have no idea who this is.

Who is this?


Hi ForsakenEagle. Please tell me what you think. You'll be the first ever, maybe last. :)



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,136
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

14 Dec 2011, 4:39 am

I like it.
But I gotta tell you - I had a creative writing instructor in college who made it clear that he thought the word alone is the most overused, sentimental word in poetry and fiction. And God help us, he'd let us know that if any in his classes dared use that word!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



rombomb2
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 197

14 Dec 2011, 9:32 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
I like it.
But I gotta tell you - I had a creative writing instructor in college who made it clear that he thought the word alone is the most overused, sentimental word in poetry and fiction. And God help us, he'd let us know that if any in his classes dared use that word!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

Interesting. I've never written a poem. Nor do I read other people's poems. Last time I read a poem was in highschool, 15 years ago. And I bet I was daydreaming. I remember not understanding literature at all.

But I disagree with your teacher on many levels.

He is telling you what he thinks *should* be done in poetry. But who says he's right? Just because it is *overused*, does that mean it shouldn't be used again? I think this is an irrational, even laughable reason not to use a word.

Think about the effect of his words on you and others. Didn't it make you feel nervous about what you should and shouldn't write in a poem? If so, his technique is disadvantageous because instilling nervousness in his student's serves to dampen the creative process.

I realize that your teacher is trying to explain what sorts of things will help increase your chances of success in the market-driven world of creative writing. But he does not necessarily *know* what will or will not sell. Sure he might have some anecdotal evidence, but this does not suffice. His techniques should be based on helping his students learn how to *be* creating in writing. His restrictions limit creativity both directly and indirectly. Directly because he says, 'Don't say alone,' and indirectly because his technique makes students nervous about what is acceptable and what isn't.

Hence his technique serves to dampen the creative process instead of improving it.

But this is why he should learn some philosophy of education like TCS (Taking Children Seriously). http://curi.us/1540-taking-children-seriously



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,136
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

14 Dec 2011, 11:40 am

rombomb2 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I like it.
But I gotta tell you - I had a creative writing instructor in college who made it clear that he thought the word alone is the most overused, sentimental word in poetry and fiction. And God help us, he'd let us know that if any in his classes dared use that word!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

Interesting. I've never written a poem. Nor do I read other people's poems. Last time I read a poem was in highschool, 15 years ago. And I bet I was daydreaming. I remember not understanding literature at all.

But I disagree with your teacher on many levels.

He is telling you what he thinks *should* be done in poetry. But who says he's right? Just because it is *overused*, does that mean it shouldn't be used again? I think this is an irrational, even laughable reason not to use a word.

Think about the effect of his words on you and others. Didn't it make you feel nervous about what you should and shouldn't write in a poem? If so, his technique is disadvantageous because instilling nervousness in his student's serves to dampen the creative process.

I realize that your teacher is trying to explain what sorts of things will help increase your chances of success in the market-driven world of creative writing. But he does not necessarily *know* what will or will not sell. Sure he might have some anecdotal evidence, but this does not suffice. His techniques should be based on helping his students learn how to *be* creating in writing. His restrictions limit creativity both directly and indirectly. Directly because he says, 'Don't say alone,' and indirectly because his technique makes students nervous about what is acceptable and what isn't.

Hence his technique serves to dampen the creative process instead of improving it.

But this is why he should learn some philosophy of education like TCS (Taking Children Seriously). http://curi.us/1540-taking-children-seriously


In truth, he was an overbearing, opinionated old bastard.
But then again, he was an easy grader.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer