Joined: 5 Apr 2011 Age: 50 Gender: Male Posts: 3,026
23 Dec 2011, 11:11 am
I just take Senator Paul at his word that he merely cannot be bothered to train or supervise his staff, or to carefully select who he wants speaking for him.
Joined: 16 Aug 2007 Age: 67 Gender: Male Posts: 9,402
23 Dec 2011, 11:25 am
blauSamstag wrote:
I just take Senator Paul at his word that he merely cannot be bothered to train or supervise his staff, or to carefully select who he wants speaking for him.
Is that what he said? He did sign the letter. He is still responsible for the contents. Even if he can't be bothered to supervise his staff, he should at least read what he is signing.
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Gender: Male Posts: 943 Location: Texas
23 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm
blauSamstag wrote:
I just take Senator Paul at his word that he merely cannot be bothered to train or supervise his staff, or to carefully select who he wants speaking for him.
Joined: 5 Apr 2011 Age: 50 Gender: Male Posts: 3,026
23 Dec 2011, 1:03 pm
pandabear wrote:
blauSamstag wrote:
I just take Senator Paul at his word that he merely cannot be bothered to train or supervise his staff, or to carefully select who he wants speaking for him.
Is that what he said? He did sign the letter. He is still responsible for the contents. Even if he can't be bothered to supervise his staff, he should at least read what he is signing.
He has not denied that they are real news letters. But he has stated that he did not write or read them.
Joined: 10 Dec 2007 Gender: Male Posts: 14,284 Location: Arizona
23 Dec 2011, 1:59 pm
Ron had no control of these newsletters, he had nothing to do with them. Clearly if you know anything about Ron Paul, you'll know this sounds nothing like him.
Joined: 5 Apr 2011 Age: 50 Gender: Male Posts: 3,026
23 Dec 2011, 2:19 pm
Jacoby wrote:
Ron had no control of these newsletters, he had nothing to do with them. Clearly if you know anything about Ron Paul, you'll know this sounds nothing like him.