History is one long war between autistics & schizophreni

Page 3 of 6 [ 87 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

wogaboo
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 151

03 Jan 2012, 11:07 am

Poke wrote:
What condition shall we ascribe to people who happen upon a simplistic idea that kinda sorta seems to make sense to them and then turn around and claim that it provides a complete description of the fundamental mechanism of the progress of civilization?


It's just a hypothesis. It could be completely wrong and if proven wrong I will move on, but to me it has a lot of explanatory power and a lot of the rebuttals against it are inconclusive. I certainly didn't mean to imply it was a "complete description" but I suspect it's an important and overlooked one.



TPE2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,461

03 Jan 2012, 11:15 am

wogaboo wrote:
Poke wrote:
What condition shall we ascribe to people who happen upon a simplistic idea that kinda sorta seems to make sense to them and then turn around and claim that it provides a complete description of the fundamental mechanism of the progress of civilization?


It's just a hypothesis. It could be completely wrong and if proven wrong I will move on, but to me it has a lot of explanatory power and a lot of the rebuttals against it are inconclusive. I certainly didn't mean to imply it was a "complete description" but I suspect it's an important and overlooked one.


But there is the slighest evidence in favour of your theory? Or it is a purely schizophrenic theory (a product of intuition and abstract reason but without empirical evidence)?



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

03 Jan 2012, 11:20 am

There's no need to prove it wrong, since you have yet to prove it correct.



rastiazul
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 87
Location: costa rica

03 Jan 2012, 11:59 am

ill just add this: i had a mild schizo girlfriend, she dumped me pretty quick but we both agreed that we were the most similar person we had found ever



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,474
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

03 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm

wogaboo wrote:
TheygoMew wrote:
Charles Manson was more on the lines of a narcissist and sociopath.


Well schizophrenics often suffer from delusions of grandeur so a narcissistic personality probably falls towards the schizophrenic end of the neurological bell curve.


That is hardly the same thing as narcissism. damn the ignorance in this thread is a little bit shocking.


_________________
We won't go back.


Angel_ryan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 745
Location: Ontario Canada

03 Jan 2012, 1:40 pm

rastiazul wrote:
ill just add this: i had a mild schizo girlfriend, she dumped me pretty quick but we both agreed that we were the most similar person we had found ever


I had a schizo affective BF we broke up because of long distance issues. He worked a lot and I still can't drive yet. In the beginning I didn't even know he was a schizo affective. I thought he had AS too, because he had strong personal interests that were similar to mine. We both love Japanese culture a lot, and we became friends in high school and watched anime together. I only found out he had it because I was talking to him about my AS, then he told me he was misdiagnosed with AS in childhood. It was eventually changed to childhood schizo affective though. His meds work incredibly for him I'd never have known unless he said something. The thing we seem to have in common diagnostically is that we both have Learning disabilities and bipolar. Though I still think AS wasn't a misdiagnosis for him, he does amazingly in his personal interests just like I do and he acts just like a lot of Aspie guys I know. Although he said I remind him of schizo affectives he knows. This and another experience I had where I helped a friend get their Schizo affective DX changed to AS has shown me just how much the two have in common with each other. I can't honestly see them as opposites.



Last edited by Angel_ryan on 03 Jan 2012, 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

TheygoMew
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Nov 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,102

03 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm

I can see why people would think Charles Manson were schizophrenic if they actually believed Charles Manson really thought it was all The Beatles fault for creating the song Helter Skelter.

The truth is, sociopaths and narcissists never blame themselves and when caught lie and blame other people or things. Much like Ted Bundy blamed porn. Charles Manson blamed The Beatles. The fact that people actually believed their reasons and decided to target porn and rock music shows that people have little understanding of psychology.

Manson took alot of LSD with his followers which was probably used with the intent to control his followers. On the stand, he revealed how narcissistic he was.

Jim Jones...was he schizophrenic or a sociopath? In his early childhood he would kill his cats just so he could have a funeral for them.

Sociopaths, everything is blamed on their behavior for something like porn and rock music or bad childhood in documentaries aired by the media yet even before some bad things happened in their childhood they were doing things like murdering their pets or placing knives all around someone's pillow. Why is there so much defense for psychopaths but a witch hunt against autism?

I have a theory. People stand up for their own.

I've been around sociopaths. Some actually ended up killing, some did not but they did kill other people's pets or try to cause someone to get into a car accident. Other sociopaths haven't killed and just live normal lives to the best they can. Sure they may think about wanting to get revenge or hurt someone but leave it as thoughts.

Is it because narcissists hate us? Narcissists can't relate, can't turn us into their golden child? The only thing the narcissist can do for supply over autistics is try to get sympathy from people.

Is it because the sociopaths hate us? The sociopaths who aren't killing, they play the game and pretend to have that empathy that they lack to survive. When the sociopath meets someone who is different and isn't playing the game, does the sociopath see a threat of exposure from someone who remembers details an awful lot and can perhaps detect the mask worn?

Well, I have a letter for any sociopath reading this.

Dear Sociopath,

You're a sociopath. I don't really care.
You play the game much better than I can...the talking, the smiling, the charm. I don't care.
You're wearing a mask. I don't care. I sometimes wear one too. It's called makeup.
You have nothing to be alarmed about. Yeah so I see through you but if you aren't running around killing people or being a complete sadistic creep. You have no need to worry. Just go about your business.


To the narcissists.

Dear narcissist,

You are a great person. You think so anyway. I'm glad you think so, someone has to do it!
You are full of it, strangers don't get it but I do. It makes me nauseous but while I'm containing my vomit to the best of my ability just know that I don't care enough to call you out.
I'm just living life the best that I can. I could care less if you and me were friends. Just go about living and so will I.



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,596

03 Jan 2012, 7:12 pm

John Nash was diagnosed schizophrenic but later it was suggested he might have Aspergers. His obsession with looking through those magazine articles and finding patterns was a hell of an intense special interest, that started with extreme logic and traveled well beyond it.

22Q11.2 deletion syndrome is now associated with both schizophrenia and autism.

Alexithymia is seen in both disorders, and it is finally understood that extreme affective empathy potentially exists in both disorders as well, particularly Aspergers.

Autism and Schizophrenia is commonly seen in close relatives.

Fluid filled ventricles in the brain are associated findings in individuals that have either, considered as incidental findings in the general population.

Faceblindness is associated with Autism And Schizophrenia.

Studies show individuals that live in higher population areas are more likely to experience symptoms of schizophrenia and autism disorders, even after they move away from these high population centers.

Both schizophrenics and autistic individuals are associated as having problems in seeing visual illusion.

The negative affect of schizophrenia is very similiar to autistic traits.

In the ICD10 psychosis in young adulthood is listed as an event that happens in some young adults with aspergers, which at the time can be mis-diagnosed as schizophrenia and medically treated as such.

In males, young adults with schizophrenia often exhibit their first manifestation of schizophrenia when reaching adulthood.

Recent genetic variants/markers found associated with autism are also associated with schizophrenia.

Individuals with Aspergers score high in personality tests that measure for schizotypal behavior. While they might not often be hot on religion, they often are hot on unexplained events like supernatural phenomenon and UFO's.

Both individuals with Aspergers and Schizophrenia personify objects in their environment.

There is a theory about an extreme female brains and schizophrenia supported by Cohen that he suggests is opposite from Cohen's theory of the extreme male brain in Autism, however many individuals with aspergers don't present as anything associated with extreme male other than the AS test, per results of gender I.D. tests, per informal results presented here on this website.

There are way too many general similiarities with these disorders, to suggest they are opposite disorders.

In fact, as research continues the similarities become more evident.

The biggest difference seems to be that psychosis is not nearly as evident in autism as it is in schizophrenia, although it is a finding in some cases of aspergers.

There is medication that effectively treats psychosis, but not any that treats the lack of psychosis.

It is thought that excessive sensitivity to dopamine causes this in schizophrenia, so schizophrenia may be something related to autism with the dopamine sensitivity jacked up, or autism may be something related to schizophrenia with the dopamine sensitivity not jacked up high enough for psychosis.

The obsessive rituals, routines, structures, special interests of some individuals with Aspergers may be coping mechanisms that keep them grounded to reality. Who knows maybe Aspergers is a milder version of schizophrenia rather than a milder version of Autism.

But, considering Autism was called schizophrenia first and there was no DSM at that point in time, if there was there could instead be a schizophrenic spectrum that all are part of, with some being identified as having a disorder within that spectrum with psychosis and some not identified with psychosis in that spectrum.

John Nash presents an interesting example of where the boundries might be, and what it is that separates him and others like him from those that don't recover from schizophrenia later in life.



Phonic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,329
Location: The graveyard of discarded toy soldiers.

03 Jan 2012, 7:17 pm

wogaboo wrote:
I believe in the theory that autism and schizophrenia fall at opposite ends of the neurological spectrum with neurotypicals in the middle:

http://classic.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55599/

On many mental traits we find the pattern:

autistics > neurotypicals > schizophrenics

Or

autistics < neurotypicals < schizophrenics.

Neurotypicals are in the middle with autistics and schizophrenics at opposite extremes.

When autistics and schizophrenics have high IQ's they can figure out a way to use their extreme neurology to make original contributions to society, however because they are polar opposites, they are constantly at war pulling the culture in opposite directions with neurotypicals caught in the middle. Schizophrenics or borderline schizophrenics use their superior social ability to get millions of neurotypicals to believe their strange delusions, thus giving rise to art and religion. Meanwhile autistics and borderline autistics use their logical ability to advance our understanding of science and technology.

Even though autistics contribute truth, and schizophrenics contribute fiction, more people follow the schizophrenics in becoming religious because the schizophrenics have superior social skills and the autistics have inferior social skills.

However over thousands of years, people eventually realize the autistics were right and science slowly triumphs over religion.


Idiot.

Not much else to say really.

- a man diagnosed with quasi schizophrenia with no social skills.


_________________
'not only has he hacked his intellect away from his feelings, but he has smashed his feelings and his capacity for judgment into smithereens'.


Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

03 Jan 2012, 7:27 pm

aghogday wrote:
John Nash was diagnosed schizophrenic but later it was suggested he might have Aspergers. His obsession with looking through those magazine articles and finding patterns was a hell of an intense special interest, that started with extreme logic and traveled well beyond it.


Was he diagnosed with it? The delusions and hallucinations he had were the basis for his schizophrenia diagnosis.



Phonic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,329
Location: The graveyard of discarded toy soldiers.

03 Jan 2012, 7:33 pm

Quote:
1) autism is believed to be the opposite of schizophrenia. Since the smart autistics are usually good in math, science and technology, we should thus conclude that smart schizophrenics are good at opposite skills: religion, art, charisma.


Art is not like religion, charisma is not the opposite of technology or math

Quote:
2) some of the great religious prophets have been suspected of schizophrenia sinced they believed they were messengers of god. Religious leaders have amazing social skills since they are worshipped by millions, and good social skills implies the opposite of autism.


No they are not suspected of this, as delusions and hallucinations must be outside cultural norms to be considered clinically significant.

verdandi's got it.

Quote:
Actually many people believe hitler was schizophrenic. On the it her hand, some believe he was autistic.


..who? I mean, outside forum posts on this site.

As the only person I THINK who is diagnosed with a schizo disorder I take great offence at this ignorance!


_________________
'not only has he hacked his intellect away from his feelings, but he has smashed his feelings and his capacity for judgment into smithereens'.


mar00
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 603
Location: Germany

03 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm

If only world was linear..



Phonic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,329
Location: The graveyard of discarded toy soldiers.

03 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm

Verdandi wrote:
aghogday wrote:
John Nash was diagnosed schizophrenic but later it was suggested he might have Aspergers. His obsession with looking through those magazine articles and finding patterns was a hell of an intense special interest, that started with extreme logic and traveled well beyond it.


Was he diagnosed with it? The delusions and hallucinations he had were the basis for his schizophrenia diagnosis.


Nope, I'm sure I would have come across Nash being diagnosed with ASD reading about him.

I keep trying to watch that movie about him, A Beautiful Mind. I can't get past the opening credits, the music makes me wretch.


_________________
'not only has he hacked his intellect away from his feelings, but he has smashed his feelings and his capacity for judgment into smithereens'.


Angel_ryan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 745
Location: Ontario Canada

03 Jan 2012, 8:01 pm

Phonic wrote:
Verdandi wrote:
aghogday wrote:
John Nash was diagnosed schizophrenic but later it was suggested he might have Aspergers. His obsession with looking through those magazine articles and finding patterns was a hell of an intense special interest, that started with extreme logic and traveled well beyond it.


Was he diagnosed with it? The delusions and hallucinations he had were the basis for his schizophrenia diagnosis.


Nope, I'm sure I would have come across Nash being diagnosed with ASD reading about him.

I keep trying to watch that movie about him, A Beautiful Mind. I can't get past the opening credits, the music makes me wretch.


I agree I think Nash was also an Aspie, but I felt the movie had a very poor representation of schizophrenia, and a more Hollywood version of his life that is not entirely factual at all. If you hate the opening just mute it and even fast forward at parts LOL. To be honest though the book a beautiful mind is way better than the movie. There's way more evidence in the book that he also had AS, because it includes his childhood. The major differences are posted here http://spectator.org/archives/2002/07/3 ... -a-beautif I won't list them too much typing for me, but I could definitely relate to the Book's portrayal of Nash.


_________________
Last edited means I caught yet another spelling mistake I missed while I was looking for them, Damn Dyslexia.


1000Knives
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,036
Location: CT, USA

03 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm

wogaboo wrote:
I believe in the theory that autism and schizophrenia fall at opposite ends of the neurological spectrum with neurotypicals in the middle:

http://classic.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55599/

On many mental traits we find the pattern:

autistics > neurotypicals > schizophrenics

Or

autistics < neurotypicals < schizophrenics.

Neurotypicals are in the middle with autistics and schizophrenics at opposite extremes.

When autistics and schizophrenics have high IQ's they can figure out a way to use their extreme neurology to make original contributions to society, however because they are polar opposites, they are constantly at war pulling the culture in opposite directions with neurotypicals caught in the middle. Schizophrenics or borderline schizophrenics use their superior social ability to get millions of neurotypicals to believe their strange delusions, thus giving rise to art and religion. Meanwhile autistics and borderline autistics use their logical ability to advance our understanding of science and technology.

Even though autistics contribute truth, and schizophrenics contribute fiction, more people follow the schizophrenics in becoming religious because the schizophrenics have superior social skills and the autistics have inferior social skills.

However over thousands of years, people eventually realize the autistics were right and science slowly triumphs over religion.


This would be a really cool theory except for the problem that I'm diagnosed NVLD and likely Aspergers. At the same point, I do have like most "schizoid" PDs diagnosed, and basically people say I'm like dead on AS. And I'm very religious, or at least I try to be, and at times religion is a special interest of mine.

Also, religion needs Aspies, who do you think the scribes were that wrote down all these religious things? In a world of like 10% literacy, you'd have to be pretty smart to learn how to read and write. Also, I know in the early days of Christendom, there were tons of ascetics and monastics who would just completely say "screw you world" and then either live in a monastery or alone and become complete total hermits. Pretty ASey kinda trait, no? Back then, Christianity appreciated those saints, but now that type of quiet lifestyle is despised by modern Christians.



Phonic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,329
Location: The graveyard of discarded toy soldiers.

03 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm

Angel_ryan wrote:
Phonic wrote:
Verdandi wrote:
aghogday wrote:
John Nash was diagnosed schizophrenic but later it was suggested he might have Aspergers. His obsession with looking through those magazine articles and finding patterns was a hell of an intense special interest, that started with extreme logic and traveled well beyond it.


Was he diagnosed with it? The delusions and hallucinations he had were the basis for his schizophrenia diagnosis.


Nope, I'm sure I would have come across Nash being diagnosed with ASD reading about him.

I keep trying to watch that movie about him, A Beautiful Mind. I can't get past the opening credits, the music makes me wretch.


I agree I think Nash was also an Aspie, but I felt the movie had a very poor representation of schizophrenia, and a more Hollywood version of his life that is not entirely factual at all. If you hate the opening just mute it and even fast forward at parts LOL. To be honest though the book a beautiful mind is way better than the movie. There's way more evidence in the book that he also had AS, because it includes his childhood. The major differences are posted here http://spectator.org/archives/2002/07/3 ... -a-beautif I won't list them too much typing for me, but I could definitely relate to the Book's portrayal of Nash.


I suppose the reason there's been no serious look into this possibility is because everything is attributed to his schizophrenia. And diagnosing him now when he's so old with ASD would seem pointless.


_________________
'not only has he hacked his intellect away from his feelings, but he has smashed his feelings and his capacity for judgment into smithereens'.