DuneyBlues wrote:
Who cares , it's harder to get in , there's more competition , more pressure , more anxiety.
Marks tell you how good at hardworking you are in things you don't like by following directions as they don't reflect intelligence.
I'm an underachiever who overachieves in math. I don't care about other subjects unless there vigorously math orientated.
It's not about 'oh hey I got my PhD at Princeton' , its not about the university you get into , its about what you do there.
Duney, I share your skepticism about the worth of going to the most prestigious schools. My understanding is their curricula are often below that of many of the better state-run institutions.
At one point in time, the Ivy League schools really had the best curricula, and they attracted the most talented teachers and students alike. They stay on top, despite their current academic deficiencies, because, with the exception of affirmative action candidates, they only take the most gifted students--those most likely to excel in life. So, these schools keep their good names regardless of what they actually teach.
Most employers jump at the chance to hire graduates of the finest schools because they have the most gifted students.
Professor Moriarty, if I may ask, what is it you profess?
Last edited by Dunnyveg on 04 Jan 2012, 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.