has anybody seen prometheus?
It sucked. Also this is from my Facebook
Last night I made the realization that Ridley Scott is the second coming of George Lucas. A once prolific director who now thinks it's good idea to rape and ruin the franchises that got him famous in the first place just because old people are f*****g crazy. First he shat out Prometheus which while visually stunning was pretty much a s**t movie, and now he's going to s**t out the sequel to Blade Runner THAT NOBODY WANTS! It's like the Star Wars prequels all over again.
Also
http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2012/ ... rometheus/
I haven't seen it, as I'm not much of a fan of the Alien series to begin with! (I should get around to watching the whole series at on point in my life).
I just wanted to say that this movie is in fact being discussed in this thread: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt200088.html
_________________
clarity of thought before rashness of action
Titangeek
Veteran
Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,696
Location: somewhere in the vicinity of betelgeuse
Last night I made the realization that Ridley Scott is the second coming of George Lucas. A once prolific director who now thinks it's good idea to rape and ruin the franchises that got him famous in the first place just because old people are f***ing crazy. First he shat out Prometheus which while visually stunning was pretty much a sh** movie, and now he's going to sh** out the sequel to Blade Runner THAT NOBODY WANTS! It's like the Star Wars prequels all over again.
Also
http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2012/ ... rometheus/
Comparing Ridley Scott to George Lucas is pretty laughable in itself. But truth be told, Prometheus was visually stunning and somewhat entertaining in places (the self-cesarean scene was icky in itself), but it's not the groundbreaking sci-fi everyone claimed it to be. Still, makes you forget about Alien 3 and Resurrection......
_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty
So true, I kind of had the same feeling with this movie - that it - gets the things back on track. A kind of reestablishment of a unique franchising.
I think the scene where David is activating the alien computer and watches the holographic model of the universe is so great and wonderfull.
This movie's theme "ancient astronaut theory" is an exceting one. I like that Ridley Scott challenge himself with this theme. It is not something which is well tested on moviegoers.
So the movie's genre may be science fiction, but the theme is not the same which one saw in Alien and Aliens. This could lead us to say that Scott is taking a new path in regard to movie conventions.
This movie also has its own unique style* which I think is refreshing and needed in this genre. I watch Prometheus as a movie where the style is more important than the action made by the characters.
*The engineers presence/concept in the movie from the very start is a good example of a unique style
So true, I kind of had the same feeling with this movie - that it - gets the things back on track. A kind of reestablishment of a unique franchising.
I think the scene where David is activating the alien computer and watches the holographic model of the universe is so great and wonderfull.
This movie's theme "ancient astronaut theory" is an exceting one. I like that Ridley Scott challenge himself with this theme. It is not something which is well tested on moviegoers.
So the movie's genre may be science fiction, but the theme is not the same which one saw in Alien and Aliens. This could lead us to say that Scott is taking a new path in regard to movie conventions.
This movie also has its own unique style* which I think is refreshing and needed in this genre. I watch Prometheus as a movie where the style is more important than the action made by the characters.
*The engineers presence/concept in the movie from the very start is a good example of a unique style
Still, i still like the Directors Cut of Alien 3.
_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty
Still, i still like the Directors Cut of Alien 3.
Well the Alien 3 directors cut was indeed very much needed. And I also think it made the movie much better.
I really to this day, cannot understand why they in the original cinema version, took out the scene were there prisoners managed to trap the alien behind that massive door. That was such a good suspense moment beacuse you knew that it was just to good to be true that the alien would stay in there. you knew that someone would mess it all up and let it out, which off course happened so the movie could continue.
I can somewhat accept the style in Alien 3. But I really disliked the one in ressourection
Still, i still like the Directors Cut of Alien 3.
Well the Alien 3 directors cut was indeed very much needed. And I also think it made the movie much better.
I really to this day, cannot understand why they in the original cinema version, took out the scene were there prisoners managed to trap the alien behind that massive door. That was such a good suspense moment beacuse you knew that it was just to good to be true that the alien would stay in there. you knew that someone would mess it all up and let it out, which off course happened so the movie could continue.
I can somewhat accept the style in Alien 3. But I really disliked the one in ressourection
I liked the original idea of having Alien 3 a colonly of monks. That would have probably been more interesting. I too like the style in the film.
Still, i still like the Directors Cut of Alien 3.
Well the Alien 3 directors cut was indeed very much needed. And I also think it made the movie much better.
I really to this day, cannot understand why they in the original cinema version, took out the scene were there prisoners managed to trap the alien behind that massive door. That was such a good suspense moment beacuse you knew that it was just to good to be true that the alien would stay in there. you knew that someone would mess it all up and let it out, which off course happened so the movie could continue.
I can somewhat accept the style in Alien 3. But I really disliked the one in ressourection
I liked the original idea of having Alien 3 a colonly of monks. That would have probably been more interesting. I too like the style in the film.
The colony of monks on that wooden planet would of been a much more better idea.
_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty
Still, i still like the Directors Cut of Alien 3.
Well the Alien 3 directors cut was indeed very much needed. And I also think it made the movie much better.
I really to this day, cannot understand why they in the original cinema version, took out the scene were there prisoners managed to trap the alien behind that massive door. That was such a good suspense moment beacuse you knew that it was just to good to be true that the alien would stay in there. you knew that someone would mess it all up and let it out, which off course happened so the movie could continue.
I can somewhat accept the style in Alien 3. But I really disliked the one in ressourection
I liked the original idea of having Alien 3 a colonly of monks. That would have probably been more interesting. I too like the style in the film.
The colony of monks on that wooden planet would of been a much more better idea.
I agree, the monk setup would, most certainly, have given a new and different approach to the concept, rather than running up and down along some dark corridors. As such I accept that it is a good dramaturgical effect (this corridor running thing), but back then in 92 when I watched Alien 3 in the cinema, I really excepted something more innovative. I remember I really got frustrated and I was rather young back then.(And therefore maybe not so critical as now)
Last night I made the realization that Ridley Scott is the second coming of George Lucas. A once prolific director who now thinks it's good idea to rape and ruin the franchises that got him famous in the first place just because old people are f***ing crazy. First he shat out Prometheus which while visually stunning was pretty much a sh** movie, and now he's going to sh** out the sequel to Blade Runner THAT NOBODY WANTS! It's like the Star Wars prequels all over again.
Also
http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2012/ ... rometheus/
Prometheus wasn't that bad. I agree its not up to par with Alien but what movie can be? But a sequel to Blade Runner..really? Is that all we can get now, remakes and sequels? Christ what a sad world live we in anymore.