Page 1 of 2 [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Jitro
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 May 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 589

25 Jan 2013, 8:43 pm

Is it true that there is no up or down in outer space? I've heard this many times.



yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

25 Jan 2013, 8:47 pm

Well if you are in space, and going up, what/where are you going up from, or to? There can't be an up or down if there's no reference point. I'm pretty sure when we refer to "up" and "down" we are talking about towards and away from the core of Earth. I.e., down is going with the gravitational pull, and up is going against it.



Last edited by yellowtamarin on 25 Jan 2013, 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Venger
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,519

25 Jan 2013, 8:49 pm

I think so otherwise in Antarctica you'd appear to be walking upside down like if you were walking on the ceiling.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,147
Location: temperate zone

25 Jan 2013, 8:58 pm

If you're an astronaut in a space ship crusing inter planetary space then there is no up or down because your floating wieghtless.

"Up" means against gravity, and down means falling towards the center of gravity. Thus on earth "up" is away from the center of the earth, and 'down' is towards the center of the earth.

So in space there is so planetary center as a point of reference.

When you land at your destination on mars then "up and down" reappear in reference to the center of Mars.

Ofcourse, as any sci fi fan knows, you can create artificial gravity by slowly spinning a large cylindrical space ship on its axis creating centripal force that pulls you towards the inside of the ship's outer walls. Do it right- and you could walk upright on the ships outer walls just like you're on earth. In that situation - down would be toward the ships walls- and up would be toward the ship's axis.You could jump straight up and then rise above the ships axis-and then start to fall "down" on your head on the other side of the ship.



Ambrose_Rotten
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 453
Location: Madison, WI

26 Jan 2013, 12:06 am

naturalplastic wrote:
Ofcourse, as any sci fi fan knows, you can create artificial gravity by slowly spinning a large cylindrical space ship on its axis creating centripal force that pulls you towards the inside of the ship's outer walls.


"The enemy's gate is down." :lol:

But yes, "Up" and "Down" are directions that can only exist in the presence of a gravitational pull. No gravity, and no up/down.



yellowtamarin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,763
Location: Australia

26 Jan 2013, 1:09 am

Ambrose_Rotten wrote:
But yes, "Up" and "Down" are directions that can only exist in the presence of a gravitational pull. No gravity, and no up/down.

I was going to say something like that, but there is gravitational pull in outer space as well. If you were floating around in our Solar System, for example, you could possibly argue that away from the Sun was "up", and towards it was "down". It gets a bit tricky though because objects in the Solar System don't just get pulled towards the Sun, they go into various orbits and such.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

26 Jan 2013, 2:24 am

up/down has little to do with gravity or direction, and allto do with perception. Same goes for other things like speed



Delphiki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Age: 181
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,415
Location: My own version of reality

26 Jan 2013, 3:56 am

MXH wrote:
up/down has little to do with gravity or direction, and allto do with perception. Same goes for other things like speed

Image


_________________
Well you can go with that if you want.


BlackSabre7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 943
Location: Queensland, Australia

26 Jan 2013, 8:12 am

Up and down is purely relative to a point of reference.
What I find amusing is that star trek should know better. They treat space like a giant 2D space-scape, and ships travel over it. They can be floating above it like a helicopter above a car, but they don't fly into the, um, 'up' direction.
It is all very like motion over the surface of the Earth. Maybe earthlings have trouble with three dimensional space :? Maybe Einsteins fabric of space-time thing has embedded itself too much in our imaginations. Maybe the phrase 'fabric of space is flat' is being taken too literally? Maybe this is why we'll never solve the gravity mystery? Maybe I need to shut up and go get a cup of coffee now?



Venger
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,519

26 Jan 2013, 9:08 am

BlackSabre7 wrote:
Up and down is purely relative to a point of reference.
What I find amusing is that star trek should know better. They treat space like a giant 2D space-scape, and ships travel over it. They can be floating above it like a helicopter above a car, but they don't fly into the, um, 'up' direction.


In "Star Trek:First Contact" there is a long scene where Picard and Worf are walking on the underside of the Enterprise's hull in space suits. The scene is first shown with them walking upside-down and then it's flipped over and shows them walking normally with the Enterprise upside-down to show there's no up/down in space.

The sound effects of things like the phasers being fired is inaccurate since there's no noise in space, but Star Trek would obviously be lame without any space sound effects.



BlackSabre7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 943
Location: Queensland, Australia

26 Jan 2013, 9:22 am

I think I remember seeing that! Yes, that would be a step up from the usual. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE next gen. Data is my hero. :heart:
They explored a lot of concepts that I really appreciated. The 3D thing is something I didn't even notice until a couple of years ago. Just another mentally 2D human :cry:

Agree about the sound effects.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

26 Jan 2013, 10:54 am

Jitro wrote:
Is it true that there is no up or down in outer space? I've heard this many times.


Can you say isotropic? Sure you can.

All directions in space far from gravitating masses are equal.

ruveyn



Trencher93
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Age: 124
Gender: Male
Posts: 464

26 Jan 2013, 11:26 am

I learned about this in the 1980s! Lionel Richie had a song "Dancing on the Ceiling".



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,147
Location: temperate zone

26 Jan 2013, 11:47 am

BlackSabre7 wrote:
I think I remember seeing that! Yes, that would be a step up from the usual. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE next gen. Data is my hero. :heart:


Wait a minute!

Aspie women LIKE Data (the TV character) ?!?!?!?!

I could act like a dorky android...for you!



BlueMax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,285

26 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm

Get yourself a joystick and play the classic Star Wars games, X-Wing or TIE Fighter... like any true space simulator, up/down loses all meaning... there's no horizon or ground for a constant reference point - you'll find yourself rolling your ship to make yourself parallel with large ships, etc... almost like a reference point for up/down is instinctual.



Ambrose_Rotten
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 453
Location: Madison, WI

26 Jan 2013, 4:10 pm

Ambrose_Rotten wrote:
"The enemy's gate is down."

Delphiki wrote:
MXH wrote:
up/down has little to do with gravity or direction, and allto do with perception. Same goes for other things like speed

Image


I may have said it first, but your version is far more spectacular. Props. :P