ShelbyGt500 wrote:
I keep seeing ads for lumosity.com for memory and logical thought improvement. I did the sample tour and I did quite well, but I'm wondering if there are any real improvements over time. Has anyone used this site, and if so, what were your results?
Yes, I have, but the effects are limited until you hit your natural limit. You'll see your percentiles shoot up at first. This is just you getting familiar with the game; it is not you actually improving. Then, you will plateau at some point, after approximately 20 sessions. It is only then that the real improvement begins. If you can inch your scores over the 95th percentile for your age, after having plateaued lower, you are probably actually improving.
You will improve in many areas of your functioning; however, you will not improve nearly as much as you do on the games themselves.
That study was flawed because it only included subjects who play brain games for fun. It did not include a population of people who have never done anything like that before, so whatever improvement they might have gotten from Lumosity was probably improved by other things; furthermore, the study did not have them using Lumosity for long enough to make a real difference; it probably only lasted long enough for them to make the famed initial improvement that doesn't mean anything.
Lumosity improved my posture, anxiety, and driving (after 3 months of use). It really doesn't seem to have affected either my visual memory or social skills, however.
I had two similar cognitive assessments about two months apart for different purposes. The second one showed improvement on some things, especially remarkable improvement on the digit spans and spatial relations, as well as some aspects of processing. Visual memory and many other things were still pretty bad and unchanged. Lumosity was the main thing I did between these two assessments. I used only the free version, however. Maybe the paid version would have shown more improvement in more areas. Dunno. Basically, I went from horrible in nearly all visual-spatial areas to good/excellent in a few, average in a few more, and still horrible on the majority.
Last edited by Tyri0n on 31 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.