Pyongyang orders its rockets on alert to hit US bases

Page 3 of 5 [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

RushKing
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States

29 Mar 2013, 3:01 pm

GGPViper wrote:
RushKing wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
Abolishment of private property, centralised economy, 5 year plans? Hmm...

North Korea is a large piece of private property. Prove me wrong. Kim Jong Un has all the characteristics of a land owner. You don't seem to oppose centralized economies when they are called corporations. Hmm...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_town

Oh dear. Once again, someone on WP has fundamentally misunderstood the scientific method.

And there isn't even a single reference to North Korea in the Wiki link you posted...

But lets look at the constitution of North Korea:
Source: http://asiamatters.blogspot.dk/2009/10/ ... -2009.html

Article 19. The DPRK shall base itself on the socialist production relations and the foundation of a self-supporting national economy.

Article 20. In the DPRK, the means of production are owned by the state and social cooperative organizations.

Article 21. The property of the state shall be the property of all the people. There shall be no limit to the property which the state can own. All the natural resources of the country, railways, air transportation, telecommunications and postal organs, as well as major factories, enterprises, ports, and banks, shall be owned solely by the state. The state shall protect and develop on a priority basis the property of the state, which plays a leading role in the economic development of the country.

Article 22. The property of social cooperative organizations shall be the collective property of the working people belonging to the organizations concerned. Such property as land, farm machinery, ships, small- and medium-sized factories, and enterprises may be owned by social cooperative organizations.

The state shall protect the property of social cooperative organizations.


... So, what we have here is a constitution mandating a centralised and planned economy and an economy which is... centralised and planned (as per the links I previously posted).

Well, if it looks like a duck...

I don't care about what their constitution says. In reality, North Korea is private property of the Kim dynasty. Kim Jong Un is an owner who subordinates and exploits just like the capitalist.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

29 Mar 2013, 3:08 pm

RushKing wrote:
I don't care about what their constitution says. In reality, North Korea is private property of the Kim dynasty. Kim Jong Un is an owner who subordinates and exploits just like the capitalist.

Proof?

See, *that's* the scientific approach...



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

29 Mar 2013, 3:12 pm

If I was President, my foreign policy would be "you talk smack, you get smacked".
I'd nuke NK today.
One of many, many reasons I am not President. :D



RushKing
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States

29 Mar 2013, 3:17 pm

GGPViper wrote:
Proof?

See, *that's* the scientific approach...


Image

Image



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

29 Mar 2013, 3:25 pm

RushKing wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
Proof?

See, *that's* the scientific approach...

Image

Image

... And what connection is there between capitalism and those two images?



RushKing
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States

29 Mar 2013, 3:32 pm

GGPViper wrote:
... And what connection is there between capitalism and those two images?

Centralized control over workplaces, taking everything the laborers on the property produce and giving the largest slice of the pie to yourself. Not a very hard connection to make.



John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

29 Mar 2013, 3:35 pm

thomas81 wrote:
John_Browning wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
if only NK had oil under their land. then things might've turned out diffferently.

I doubt by much. It's not too bad of land natural resource wise. They have prospered in the past, but now they have a system that would still have 3rd and 4th world conditions even if they were given a place like Kuwait, Texas, or Alaska.


You talk about NK's poverty related issues, but the reality is it isnt faring any worse (in some ways better) than many of its capitalist counterparts. NK's problem isn't necessarilly Socialism but the horrible Juche ideology which creates a caste system based on the loyalty of family lines to Kim Il Jung.

Infant mortality, literacy, attended births and representation of women
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/infmort.html
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/lit.html
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/birth.html
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/women.html

FAQ's
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/faq.html

North Korean Acheivements
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/whatd ... eshed.html

Western lies exposed
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/lies.html

That's why so many of them seek political asylum (or just plain hide out) in China, of all places... :roll:


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

29 Mar 2013, 3:41 pm

GGPViper wrote:
Image

KJU: "Now, comrades, if you could please leave me in private..." :lol:


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

29 Mar 2013, 3:43 pm

thomas81 wrote:
John_Browning wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
if only NK had oil under their land. then things might've turned out diffferently.

I doubt by much. It's not too bad of land natural resource wise. They have prospered in the past, but now they have a system that would still have 3rd and 4th world conditions even if they were given a place like Kuwait, Texas, or Alaska.


You talk about NK's poverty related issues, but the reality is it isnt faring any worse (in some ways better) than many of its capitalist counterparts. NK's problem isn't necessarilly Socialism but the horrible Juche ideology which creates a caste system based on the loyalty of family lines to Kim Il Jung.

Infant mortality, literacy, attended births and representation of women
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/infmort.html
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/lit.html
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/birth.html
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/women.html

FAQ's
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/faq.html

North Korean Acheivements
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/whatd ... eshed.html

Western lies exposed
http://koreantruth.awardspace.com/lies.html


"A stated above, the DPRK has 3 political parties:

Workers' Party of Korea
Korean Social Democratic Party
Chongdoist Chungu Party (Religious)

These parties are not opposition parties. They do not challenge Workers Party of Korea, but they are working side by side with it, and they share common goals. These two parties work hand in had with the main KWP in order to achieve its nation building and they do not confront KWP in achieving their objectives but instead via consultations."

That doesn't sound like "democracy" to me. The WPK obviously calls all the shots. :roll:



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

29 Mar 2013, 3:54 pm

ruveyn wrote:
FMX wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
sabre-rattling

they have neither the ability or the reason to do so


This. Not even Kim Jong-Un is deluded enough to actually believe he can beat the US.


I hope he tries. I would love to see Pynonyang turned into a parking lot.

ruveyn


That's easy to say when you live in New Jersey, not South Korea or Japan. Hopefully the broader party and military would be smart enough to defy his orders. The US has the capacity to take down a long range ICBM headed for the US mainland, but would not be able to react in time to protect places closer to Pynonyang.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

29 Mar 2013, 4:05 pm

RushKing wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
... And what connection is there between capitalism and those two images?

Centralized control over workplaces, taking everything the laborers on the property produce and giving the largest slice of the pie to yourself. Not a very hard connection to make.

So, under capitalism, control of the workplace is centralized in one place in the country?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

29 Mar 2013, 4:13 pm

marshall wrote:

That's easy to say when you live in New Jersey, not South Korea or Japan. Hopefully the broader party and military would be smart enough to defy his orders. The US has the capacity to take down a long range ICBM headed for the US mainland, but would not be able to react in time to protect places closer to Pynonyang.


If you are overly worried about nukes, Pyongyang could be bombed to flinders with conventional weapons.

The water supply could be interdicted by a few well placed bombs. The power stations could easily be taken out. The best time to do it is in the winter when it gets really cold.

ruveyn



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

29 Mar 2013, 4:31 pm

GGPViper wrote:
RushKing wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
... And what connection is there between capitalism and those two images?

Centralized control over workplaces, taking everything the laborers on the property produce and giving the largest slice of the pie to yourself. Not a very hard connection to make.

So, under capitalism, control of the workplace is centralized in one place in the country?


its centralised between a few individuals, and the status quo maintained through usury, nepotism and convenient economic conditions.

No better than your average axis-of-evil dictatorship, when it boils down to it.


_________________
Being 'normal' is over rated.

My deviant art profile


GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

29 Mar 2013, 4:57 pm

thomas81 wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
RushKing wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
... And what connection is there between capitalism and those two images?

Centralized control over workplaces, taking everything the laborers on the property produce and giving the largest slice of the pie to yourself. Not a very hard connection to make.

So, under capitalism, control of the workplace is centralized in one place in the country?

its centralised between a few individuals, and the status quo maintained through usury, nepotism and convenient economic conditions.

No better than your average axis-of-evil dictatorship, when it boils down to it.

This is utterly ridiculous and blatantly false. Some of the greatest improvements in living standards in the world are due to the wealth generated by capitalism.

The Index of Economic Freedom (a common indicator of "capitalism") is strongly correlated with GDP, and GDP is strongly correlated with substantial quality of life indicators like life expectancy and infant mortality.

Hide in your cocoon all you want. The facts are on my side...



RushKing
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States

29 Mar 2013, 5:10 pm

GGPViper wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
RushKing wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
... And what connection is there between capitalism and those two images?

Centralized control over workplaces, taking everything the laborers on the property produce and giving the largest slice of the pie to yourself. Not a very hard connection to make.

So, under capitalism, control of the workplace is centralized in one place in the country?

its centralised between a few individuals, and the status quo maintained through usury, nepotism and convenient economic conditions.

No better than your average axis-of-evil dictatorship, when it boils down to it.

This is utterly ridiculous and blatantly false. Some of the greatest improvements in living standards in the world are due to the wealth generated by capitalism.

The Index of Economic Freedom (a common indicator of "capitalism") is strongly correlated with GDP, and GDP is strongly correlated with substantial quality of life indicators like life expectancy and infant mortality.

Hide in your cocoon all you want. The facts are on my side...

Noam Chomsky destroyed this argument.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFxYyXGMfZM[/youtube]



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

29 Mar 2013, 5:43 pm

RushKing wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
RushKing wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
... And what connection is there between capitalism and those two images?

Centralized control over workplaces, taking everything the laborers on the property produce and giving the largest slice of the pie to yourself. Not a very hard connection to make.

So, under capitalism, control of the workplace is centralized in one place in the country?

its centralised between a few individuals, and the status quo maintained through usury, nepotism and convenient economic conditions.

No better than your average axis-of-evil dictatorship, when it boils down to it.

This is utterly ridiculous and blatantly false. Some of the greatest improvements in living standards in the world are due to the wealth generated by capitalism.

The Index of Economic Freedom (a common indicator of "capitalism") is strongly correlated with GDP, and GDP is strongly correlated with substantial quality of life indicators like life expectancy and infant mortality.

Hide in your cocoon all you want. The facts are on my side...

Noam Chomsky destroyed this argument.

[video link omitted]

This may come as a shocking surprise to you, RushKing, but not everyone on this planet blind follower of Noam Chomsky.