wittgenstein wrote:
Actually, it is the elite Republicans that want to reward laziness and not reward work. Betting on others work (Wall Street etc) is hardly taxed at all while work (both creative and manuel) is taxed heavily. As for criminals? Wall Street and the banks stole from us and destroyed our economy. The amount spent on welfare for the poor is tiny compared to welfare for the rich.
I wish the 1%would actually do some work and stop living off of us. Did you know that 400 individual Americans own half of the United State's value? Liberals want to return to those wild liberal days the 1950s! In the Eisenhower era working people were actually rewarded for their work.
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to say about finance. The reason why many people seek to tax financial investment less is because if people respond to incentives, higher returns on investment should result in higher rates of investment. More investment means more money available to create capital. Capital drives growth, because any long-run growth in the economy has to be a result of some investment that ends up making sure we can use the resources we have better.
That's not to say Republicans have it right or anything else. It's just not an obviously dumb idea, and there are papers arguing that tax cuts on investment will lead to higher rates, just not close to sufficiently high to fund the tax cut.